1994
DOI: 10.1006/viro.1994.1494
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Entry of Coxsackievirus A9 into Host Cells: Specific Interactions with αvβ3 Integrin, the Vitronectin Receptor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
131
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 186 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
131
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In parechoviruses, CAV9 and echovirus 9, the RGD motif is exactly the same distance from the VP1 C terminus, but the significance of this is unclear. The significance of the parechovirus RGD has been further shown by virus competition using CAV9, by blocking with specific peptides and by phage-display approaches (Roivainen et al, 1994 ;Stanway et al, 1994 ;Pulli et al, 1997).…”
Section: Cgeh F Ghazi and Others F Ghazi And Othersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In parechoviruses, CAV9 and echovirus 9, the RGD motif is exactly the same distance from the VP1 C terminus, but the significance of this is unclear. The significance of the parechovirus RGD has been further shown by virus competition using CAV9, by blocking with specific peptides and by phage-display approaches (Roivainen et al, 1994 ;Stanway et al, 1994 ;Pulli et al, 1997).…”
Section: Cgeh F Ghazi and Others F Ghazi And Othersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In support of this is the fact that, in comparison to FMDV, the N terminus of VP1 in ERAV is highly hydrophilic (Varrasso et al, 2001). In FMDV, the N terminus of VP1 is confined to the interior of the capsid, within a deep and predominantly hydrophobic cleft formed by the interface between VP2 and VP3 (Acharya et al, 1989;Curry et al, 1997;Lea et al, 1994), although N-terminal residues of PV-1, which are known also to be located internally in the capsid, have been shown to elicit virus-neutralizing antibodies (Fricks & Hogle, 1990;Roivainen et al, 1994).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stanway et al, 1994), and a different pair (avb3 and avb6) for CAV-9 (Heikkilä et al, 2009;Roivainen et al, 1991Roivainen et al, , 1994Williams et al, 2004). Likewise, in GMK cells, the reactive heterodimers are probably either avb3 or avb6, since, according to our earlier studies, the expression level of heterodimer avb1 was extremely low in GMK cells .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%