2006
DOI: 10.2514/1.20677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Entry Configurations and Performance Comparisons for the Mars Smart Lander

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• • A fully internal actuator preserves the integrity of the aero-shell with no external aerodynamic tabs, thruster nozzles, etc., that would be found on other actuator concepts [6].…”
Section: Enables the Ballast Mass Actuators To Be Designed So As To Ementioning
confidence: 62%
“…• • A fully internal actuator preserves the integrity of the aero-shell with no external aerodynamic tabs, thruster nozzles, etc., that would be found on other actuator concepts [6].…”
Section: Enables the Ballast Mass Actuators To Be Designed So As To Ementioning
confidence: 62%
“…Lockwood et al discuss entry issues for the Mars Smart Lander [now the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL)] [99]. MSL is to be a 70-deg sphere-cone forebody with a biconic afterbody [100].…”
Section: Mars Science Laboratorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Novel structural and control concepts that enable the decelerator to undergo variation in geometry are the subject of this paper. It should be noted that other alternatives that have been proposed for the aerodynamic control problem make use of aerodynamic surfaces such as tabs or flaps 3 . They are either fixed in configuration or single-shot deployable, which limits them to only a few discrete configurations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%