2009
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9947-09-04399-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Entropy solutions for the $p(x)$-Laplace equation

Abstract: Abstract. We consider a Dirichlet problem in divergence form with variable growth, modeled on the p(x)-Laplace equation. We obtain existence and uniqueness of an entropy solution for L 1 data, as well as integrability results for the solution and its gradient. The proofs rely crucially on a priori estimates in Marcinkiewicz spaces with variable exponent, for which we obtain new inclusion results of independent interest.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
77
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that there is in general no uniqueness in W 1,q(·) ; see the counterexamples already found for the constant coefficient case in [50,46]. Concerning the existence of a SOLA we note that, since we are assuming p(·) ≥ 2, in particular cases (for instance when n ≤ 10, or p(·) ≡ const) the entropy solution constructed in [49,Theorem 1.3] or [8, Theorem 2.1] coincides with the SOLA (see [49,Remark 5.7]), and hence we can infer existence from there. However, in our case of exponents p(·) ≥ 2 lying above the critical exponent 2 − 1/n the existence theory is essentially easier and we can infer existence-and uniqueness when µ ∈ L…”
Section: Gradient Estimate For General Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Note that there is in general no uniqueness in W 1,q(·) ; see the counterexamples already found for the constant coefficient case in [50,46]. Concerning the existence of a SOLA we note that, since we are assuming p(·) ≥ 2, in particular cases (for instance when n ≤ 10, or p(·) ≡ const) the entropy solution constructed in [49,Theorem 1.3] or [8, Theorem 2.1] coincides with the SOLA (see [49,Remark 5.7]), and hence we can infer existence from there. However, in our case of exponents p(·) ≥ 2 lying above the critical exponent 2 − 1/n the existence theory is essentially easier and we can infer existence-and uniqueness when µ ∈ L…”
Section: Gradient Estimate For General Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…(Ω) the general existence theory of weak solutions does not apply and therefore one has to consider a more general notion of solution. In the literature there are different approaches, see [8,40,49]. We shall follow the one introduced in [9,10,14] (Ω) and therefore the weak formulation of (1.11) makes sense for a SOLA.…”
Section: Gradient Estimate For General Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using the same argument in ( [22], Proposition 5.1), we can prove that (u n ) n is a Cauchy sequence in measure, then there exists a subsequence still denoted (u n ) n such that u n → u a.e. in Ω, we conclude that…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Equation (1.1) was also studied by Bendahmane et al [15], where the well-posedness is proved for renormalized solutions in an L 1 -framework for continuous variable exponents. Moreover, the existence and uniqueness of entropy solutions and the equivalence between two notions of solutions are discussed for log-Hölder continuous variable exponents in [38] by Zhang and Zhou (see also [36] for an elliptic counterpart).…”
Section: G Akagi and K Matsuuramentioning
confidence: 99%