2015
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2556389
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Entropy-Balanced Discretionary Accruals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First, we use firm fixed effects to account for any unobservable time-invariant factors related to the firm, which can bias our inferences. Second, we employ an entropy balancing technique, which is a quasi-matching approach that weights each observation such that post-weighting distributional properties of treatment and control observations are virtually identical, thereby ensuring covariate balance (Hainmueller, 2012;McMullin and Schonberger, 2015). 13 To see the intuition behind entropy balancing, consider it in the context of the traditional propensity score matching (PSM) approach.…”
Section: Research Design and Empirical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, we use firm fixed effects to account for any unobservable time-invariant factors related to the firm, which can bias our inferences. Second, we employ an entropy balancing technique, which is a quasi-matching approach that weights each observation such that post-weighting distributional properties of treatment and control observations are virtually identical, thereby ensuring covariate balance (Hainmueller, 2012;McMullin and Schonberger, 2015). 13 To see the intuition behind entropy balancing, consider it in the context of the traditional propensity score matching (PSM) approach.…”
Section: Research Design and Empirical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To examine the impact of IR on information assimilation, we conduct our analyses using an entropy balancing technique, which is a quasi-matching approach that weights each observation such that post-weighting distributional properties of treatment and control observations are virtually identical, thereby ensuring covariate balance (Hainmueller, 2012;McMullin and Schonberger, 2015). 5 Given the decision to initiate an IR program is a firm choice, it is important to control for factors that drive firms' decision to hire IR officers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Panel B uses firms that issue press releases during the 12-month pre-prospectus period as the treatment sample and assigns weights to firms not issuing press releases as the control sample. The match ratio (see McMullin and Schonberger, 2015) is used to assess the number of control sample observations receiving above equal weights relative to the full control sample (a ratio of 0.5 indicates an even reweighting). To assess covariate balance for each covariate, we compute standardized differences calculated as the difference in means between treated and control samples divided by the standard deviation of the treated sample.…”
Section: Appendix Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, to ensure that samples of disclosing and non-disclosing firms appear similar based on fundamental determinants of the decision to disclose, we use entropy balancing to reweight the control sample of non-disclosing firms in our regressions so that no significant differences exist in the means, variances, or skewness of any key disclosure determinants across the two samples. This form of matching on observables (i.e., entropy balancing) retains all control sample observations while limiting concerns with potentially noisy one-to-one matches (Hainmueller, 2012;McMullin and Schonberger, 2015). After entropy balancing, disclosing and non-disclosing samples display minimal differences in the distribution of determinants associated with the decision to disclose, aiding in our identification of the effect of the disclosures themselves separate from (correlated) fundamentals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use entropy balancing to mitigate the effect of differences in characteristics between firms with high and low levels of complexity (Hainmueller, 2012;McMullin and Schonberger, 2015). Selection bias potentially affects our inferences, despite having firm fixed effects and several characteristics as controls in our main analyses.…”
Section: Covariate Balancingmentioning
confidence: 99%