1934
DOI: 10.1063/1.1749408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Entropy and the Absolute Rate of Chemical Reactions I. The Steric Factor of Bimolecular Associations

Abstract: The equilibrium constant for a bimolecular association may be expressed in terms of the energy change, ΔE, and standard entropy change, ΔS°, on association. On account of the well-known relation between the equilibrium constant, and the rate constants of the bimolecular association and its reverse, the corresponding unimolecular decomposition, the values of these rate constants could be determined separately, if one could divide each of the terms, ΔE and ΔS°, into two parts, in the proper way. The proper metho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1936
1936
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(13) Note that the thermodynamic limit, described in eq 10, conforms to that relation. Thus the Rice-Gershinowitz assumption, which might have been expected to apply only to "tight", localized transition states, pertains also to at least one limit of those derived from spherically-symmetric potentials.…”
Section: Activation Energiesmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…(13) Note that the thermodynamic limit, described in eq 10, conforms to that relation. Thus the Rice-Gershinowitz assumption, which might have been expected to apply only to "tight", localized transition states, pertains also to at least one limit of those derived from spherically-symmetric potentials.…”
Section: Activation Energiesmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…To obtain the term a lnk(Tl)/aJ* in that equation, however, we will need to adopt a model. It will be assumed, following Rice and Gershinowitz [18], that angular Applications of this result in several contexts have been given [19,20]. It must be emphasized however that, despite a superficial similarity to (17), this relation is on a more tenuous footing.…”
Section: Alnk(ea) --Alnk(ttx)+(?ln[q(rt)/q(t)]mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Only for 'loose' transition states will these factors differ significantly, however [9]. The value reported above makes it clear that reaction (18) does not fall into this category. It thus offers a reliable measure of what to expect in a heat bath.…”
Section: E )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Lagrange multiplier p for the constraint (24) of detailed balance can be solved for by introducing (34) and (35) To solve for q it is necessary to insert (40) or (39) in (17). Using (1 1). or, for the probabilities / [ ( n ) -2a(la ) ] .…”
Section: The Lagrange Multipliersmentioning
confidence: 99%