2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0303-2647(01)00171-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Entropy and complexity of finite sequences as fluctuating quantities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…N-gram models are frequently applied to speech recognition and natural language tagging [38], but they have also been applied to sequence analysis and motif identification [32,39-41]. We built two types of cleavage models.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…N-gram models are frequently applied to speech recognition and natural language tagging [38], but they have also been applied to sequence analysis and motif identification [32,39-41]. We built two types of cleavage models.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Language models including n-gram models are most frequently applied in speech recognition and natural language tagging (Rosenfeld 2000), but have also been applied to the sequence analysis and motif identification (Jimenez-Montano et al 2002;Wu and Shivakumar 1994;Wu et al 1996). Cleavage by the proteasome occurs at preferential sites within the protein, and sequence signals from antigenic peptides processed by the proteasome are especially conserved at position P1 of the cleavage site (the Cterminus of antigenic peptide) and its immediate flanking P1' residue .…”
Section: Prediction Of Mhci-restricted and Mhcii-restricted T-cell Epmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S-measure: For the purpose of comparing an observable M computed for symbolic sequences of finite length to their surrogate counterparts, Ref. [36] (1) ] (note that this corresponds to the construction procedure 1 for surrogate sequences in Ref. [36]), using 10 2 surrogate sequences for averaging obtained by standard random shuffling.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%