2022
DOI: 10.1112/topo.12243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Entropy and affine actions for surface groups

Abstract: We give a short and independent proof of a theorem of Danciger and Zhang: surface groups with Hitchin linear part cannot act properly on the affine space. The proof is fundamentally different and relies on ergodic methods.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
(60 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequently, Labourie [Lab01] showed that if Γ is the fundamental group of a compact orientable surface without boundary and of genus atleast two and (ρ, u) : Γ → SO n+1,n ⋉ R 2n+1 is such that ρ is Fuchsian, then (ρ, u)(Γ) does not act properly on R 2n+1 . Recently, Danciger-Zhang [DZ19] and Labourie [Lab22] generalized Labourie's result and showed that if Γ is the fundamental group of a compact orientable surface without boundary and of genus atleast two and (ρ, u) : Γ → SO n+1,n ⋉ R 2n+1 is such that ρ is Hitchin, then (ρ, u)(Γ) does not act properly on R 2n+1 . Both these results generalize the first reformulation of Mess' result.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, Labourie [Lab01] showed that if Γ is the fundamental group of a compact orientable surface without boundary and of genus atleast two and (ρ, u) : Γ → SO n+1,n ⋉ R 2n+1 is such that ρ is Fuchsian, then (ρ, u)(Γ) does not act properly on R 2n+1 . Recently, Danciger-Zhang [DZ19] and Labourie [Lab22] generalized Labourie's result and showed that if Γ is the fundamental group of a compact orientable surface without boundary and of genus atleast two and (ρ, u) : Γ → SO n+1,n ⋉ R 2n+1 is such that ρ is Hitchin, then (ρ, u)(Γ) does not act properly on R 2n+1 . Both these results generalize the first reformulation of Mess' result.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%