2023
DOI: 10.1088/1402-4896/aceaba
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Entropy analysis of slip flow second-grade Cu − EO and TiO 2 − EO nanofluids using Modified Buongiorno model

Abstract: The current research investigates the magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) slip flow of second-grade nanofluids past a permeable stretching sheet in a porous medium. The flow analysis is accomplished considering thermophoresis, Brownian diffusion, chemical reaction, and elastic deformation. The implementation of the Modified Buongiorno model (MBM) on second-grade nanofluid is the novel aspect of the study. The formulated coupled nonlinear equations are non-dimensionalized, applying suitable similarity transformation. Num… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the significance of Bejan number and entropy generation number are discussed elaborately via graphs. The tabulated results of skin friction coefficient and Nusselt number are correlated with Hakeem et al [40], Ibrahim and Shanker [41], and Rath and Nayak [42].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, the significance of Bejan number and entropy generation number are discussed elaborately via graphs. The tabulated results of skin friction coefficient and Nusselt number are correlated with Hakeem et al [40], Ibrahim and Shanker [41], and Rath and Nayak [42].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The developed numerical result is validated by correlating with the results of Hakeem et al [40], Ibrahim and Shanker [41], and Rath and Nayak [42]. The skin friction coefficient values are recomputed by fixing j = 0 (pure fluid), β 1 = 0 (Newtonian fluid), and ξ = π/2 (orthogonal magnetic field).…”
Section: Tables For Comparison Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%