Entrepreneurship: The Role of Clusters Theoretical Perspectives and Empirical Evidence from Germany

Abstract

This paper is about the impact of clusters on entrepreneurship at the regional level. Defining entrepreneurship as the creation of new organisations and clusters as a geographically proximate group of interconnected firms and associated institutions in related industries, this paper aims to answer three research questions : first, do clusters matter to entrepreneurship at the regional level? Second, if clusters are associated with different levels of entrepreneurship, what explains those differences? Third, what do the answers to the previous questions imply for academics and policy makers? To answer these questions, this paper distinguishes between clusters and industrial agglomerations and advances a theoretical model and empirical research to explain the impact of clusters on entrepreneurship at the regional level. This paper uses the 97 German planning regions as units of analysis to test the hypotheses. Using hypotheses testing and OLS fixed-effects model, this paper finds that clusters do have an impact on entrepreneurship at the regional level, but industrial agglomerations do not. Implications for academics and policy makers and suggestions for future research are given in the concluding section. Copyright Springer 2005entrepreneurship, clusters, industrial agglomerations, socioeconomics, neoclassical economics, Germany,

Territorial servitization: Exploring the virtuous circle connecting knowledge-intensive services and new manufacturing businesses

“…Although public administrations in the US and Europe acknowledge the potential transformative power of service innovation (European Commission, 2011;2012), the analysis of the territorial impact of servitization processes based on meso or macro approaches remains largely unaddressed. Rocha and Sternberg (2005) detected that the level of entrepreneurial activity in regions with geographically proximate groups of established interconnected firms and institutions contributed comparatively more towards regional economic performance. The key, according to these authors, does not come from economic territorial specialization or from the pure quantitative agglomeration of firms in a particular region, but rather from the interconnections and complementarities that link these together (Boix & Vaillant, 2011).…”

“…Vigorous manufacturing sectors are characterized by agglomeration economies (Rocha & Sternberg, 2005). Both the stock of manufacturing businesses and their economic activity produce a spillover effect, which has direct consequences on local business performance (Andersson & Lööf, 2011).…”

Multitasking, but for what benefit? The dilemma facing Nigerian university students regarding part-time working

“…Degeorge and Fayolle, 2008;Kakkonen, 2010), or indeed that students may become more negative about entrepreneurship as they progress through their studies (Kakkonen, 2010). On the influence of the rural-urban location of a specific university, there seems to be a trend consensus that students who study in larger cities have more entrepreneurial intentions, than those who study in smaller cities (Fuller-Love, Midmore, Thomas and Henley, 2006;Rocha and Sternberg, 2005). It is therefore arguable, that students in the university in the sample in this work, may be more predisposed towards self-employment, merely because they are located in a large city.…”

Sustaining Competitiveness: Moving Towards Upstream Manufacturing in Specialized-Market-Based Clusters in the Chinese Toy Industry

“…Generally speaking, the agglomeration of SAs makes it more convenient for customers to get access to transparent information about homogeneous commodities for a low transaction cost [43]. Moreover, local firms in the same location share value and cultural traditions in common, which is helpful in building up formal and informal trust-based relationships [44]. The importance of these close and intensive relationships between local firms is highlighted in the decrease of transaction costs and transmission of knowledge and information in particular [45,46].…”