2018
DOI: 10.1504/ijesb.2018.10013257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Entrepreneurship policy in Brazil: its focus and gaps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An innovation policy may be conceptualized as a series of governmental activities translated into plans, programs, projects or actions aimed at fostering innovation (Audretsch & Link, 2012;Bajmócy & Gébert, 2014;Landström et al, 2012;Landström et al, 2015;Öner & Kunday, 2016;Patanakul & Pinto, 2014). Given that such policies directly affect existing businesses and have the potential of contributing to the creation of new ones, they must be integrated with the entrepreneurship policies (Bhupatiraju et al, 2012;Fagerberg, Fosaas, & Sapprasert, 2012;Landström et al, 2015), which in turn are aimed at fostering the creation of new businesses and/or strengthening the existing ones (Borges, Bezerra, Silva, Andreassi, & Ferreira, 2018;Lundström & Stevenson, 2005;Minniti, 2008;Mirzanti et al, 2015;Öner & Kunday, 2016;Qian & Haynes, 2014). Despite the similarities, innovation and entrepreneurship policies are usually dissociated from one another in such a way that most of the current innovation policies have goals that do not reflect the context they were meant for (Audretsch & Link, 2012;Bajmócy & Gébert, 2014).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An innovation policy may be conceptualized as a series of governmental activities translated into plans, programs, projects or actions aimed at fostering innovation (Audretsch & Link, 2012;Bajmócy & Gébert, 2014;Landström et al, 2012;Landström et al, 2015;Öner & Kunday, 2016;Patanakul & Pinto, 2014). Given that such policies directly affect existing businesses and have the potential of contributing to the creation of new ones, they must be integrated with the entrepreneurship policies (Bhupatiraju et al, 2012;Fagerberg, Fosaas, & Sapprasert, 2012;Landström et al, 2015), which in turn are aimed at fostering the creation of new businesses and/or strengthening the existing ones (Borges, Bezerra, Silva, Andreassi, & Ferreira, 2018;Lundström & Stevenson, 2005;Minniti, 2008;Mirzanti et al, 2015;Öner & Kunday, 2016;Qian & Haynes, 2014). Despite the similarities, innovation and entrepreneurship policies are usually dissociated from one another in such a way that most of the current innovation policies have goals that do not reflect the context they were meant for (Audretsch & Link, 2012;Bajmócy & Gébert, 2014).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We created a classification form in order to identify general aspects, characteristics of the target audience, and characteristics of the actions (Lundström & Stevenson, 2005). The form was used in a previous study (Borges et al, 2018) and contains the following: (a) control number, (b) name of the policy, (c) type of policy, (d) year of creation, (e) objective, (f) responsible body, (g) target audience, (h) type of support offered, (i) agents involved, (j) local context, (k) intended results, (l) follow-up mechanisms, (m) policy impacts, (n) evaluation metrics, and (o) link to website.…”
Section: Open Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%