2016
DOI: 10.1504/ijesb.2016.077576
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Entrepreneurship as a community phenomenon; reconnecting meanings and place

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
69
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
69
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies of entrepreneurship in depleted places have not demonstrated this social disapproval of how entrepreneurship was achieved (Anderson and Gaddefors ; Korsgaard, Ferguson, and Gaddefors ; McKeever, Jack, and Anderson ). However, these studies do show a greater extent of social involvement in small business practices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other studies of entrepreneurship in depleted places have not demonstrated this social disapproval of how entrepreneurship was achieved (Anderson and Gaddefors ; Korsgaard, Ferguson, and Gaddefors ; McKeever, Jack, and Anderson ). However, these studies do show a greater extent of social involvement in small business practices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We argue that identity and place intertwine in the experience of belonging (Shepherd and Haynie ), but are not always in harmony. Entrepreneurial identity is earned through actions, performance, but the sense of belonging is created through cultural, social constructions along with local interactions, personal experiences, and individual beliefs (Anderson and Gaddefors ). Consequently, places are where identity is enacted, but also where entrepreneurs are socially situated; where they “belong.” The interplay between different formations of identity should be conceptually informative.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chalmers and Shaw (2017) explain that understanding of context is largely shaped by the ontological and epistemological stances assumed by researcher. Given our argument that rural engagement captures practice, and engagement can be with the imagined as well as the 'material' (Anderson and Gaddefors, 2016), the ontological assumptions of positivism seem poorly equipped (Leitch et al, 2010) to deal with intangible social constructions (Jennings et al, 2005). The empirical manifestations of social constructions may be elusive, albeit experienced as very real.…”
Section: On Methodology and Methods (How Can We Study Entrepreneurshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, entrepreneuring is 'protean' in form, it takes shape from the context. Moreover, in a recent, but provocatively extreme case, Gaddefors and Anderson (2016) showed how a rural context created entrepreneurship. Thus, we acknowledge that enterprise takes many forms, that it arises within different contexts; however, we are very cautious about conflating context with form.…”
Section: For Example;mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social entrepreneurship is seen frequently as a socialized and community phenomenon. Social entrepreneurs are often prone to identify and accept their proactive role in the local community, to feel a sense of attachment and belonging to this place where they one used to be with and now want to be members of [14]. Social entrepreneurship is expressed by conscious willingness and readiness to help the local society, to be focused on social and environmental implications of business decisions, operations and activities [15].…”
Section: A Social Entrepreneurshipmentioning
confidence: 99%