Revitalizing Entrepreneurship Education 2018
DOI: 10.4324/9781315447599-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Entrepreneurship and the entrepreneurial self

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Organization-creation is an expression of social creativity that transforms ‘potentiality’ into new organizational forms within established organizations (Farias et al, 2019; Hjorth, 2004, 2005; Hjorth & Reay, 2022). Potentiality refers to the ‘virtually new’ – that is, the not yet actualized – that allows organizations to differentiate themselves from other organizations (Hjorth, 2014; Hjorth & Reay, 2022); for example, through the development of alternative (Redmalm & Skoglund, 2022; Skoglund, Redmalm, & Berglund, 2020) or social (Berglund & Skoglund, 2015; Calás et al, 2018; Dey & Steyaert, 2010, 2012) entrepreneurship that contributes to value for society (Farias et al, 2019; Rindova, Barry, & Ketchen, 2009). As Steyaert and Katz (2004) note, entrepreneurship is about ‘introducing innovative thinking, reorganizing the established, and crafting the new across a broad range of settings and spaces and for a range of goals such as social change and transformation far beyond those of simple commerce and economic drive’ (p. 182).…”
Section: Organization-creation and Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organization-creation is an expression of social creativity that transforms ‘potentiality’ into new organizational forms within established organizations (Farias et al, 2019; Hjorth, 2004, 2005; Hjorth & Reay, 2022). Potentiality refers to the ‘virtually new’ – that is, the not yet actualized – that allows organizations to differentiate themselves from other organizations (Hjorth, 2014; Hjorth & Reay, 2022); for example, through the development of alternative (Redmalm & Skoglund, 2022; Skoglund, Redmalm, & Berglund, 2020) or social (Berglund & Skoglund, 2015; Calás et al, 2018; Dey & Steyaert, 2010, 2012) entrepreneurship that contributes to value for society (Farias et al, 2019; Rindova, Barry, & Ketchen, 2009). As Steyaert and Katz (2004) note, entrepreneurship is about ‘introducing innovative thinking, reorganizing the established, and crafting the new across a broad range of settings and spaces and for a range of goals such as social change and transformation far beyond those of simple commerce and economic drive’ (p. 182).…”
Section: Organization-creation and Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other research has shown the importance of entrepreneurship educators conveying alternative worldviews, values, and models in line with today's social and environmental challenges to their students (e.g. Biberhofer et al , 2019; Skoglund and Berglund, 2018). The aim of our lesson, described in more detail below, was thus to enrich students' conceptions of responsible entrepreneurship, as an alternative vision of entrepreneurship that would guide the rest of the course.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With entrepreneurship seemingly having found its way to the very core of the university (by that notion of the entrepreneurial university), Tunstall effectively argues how some see this as the evil of capitalism having creeped into the idea of academic freedom as the very purpose of higher education. Skoglund and Berglund (2018) take this further, into the classroom, by challenging the notion of achieving freedom through entrepreneurship. They invite students to bring pictures that relate to entrepreneurship.…”
Section: Deconstructing In Eementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in line with what Tunstall (2018) suggests when he discusses the reconstructing of alternatives of entrepreneurship which “create new ways to tackle the interface of teaching, research, society and economy” (p. 29). Skoglund and Berglund (2018) adopt such an approach in the classroom, where students are invited to try out how a social mission can be aligned with a fictive company (see previous section). In this way, they can reconstruct how boundaries can be drawn between the state and the business, with regards to solving a political issue.…”
Section: Reconstructing In Eementioning
confidence: 99%