Entrepreneurship and Bank Credit Availability

Abstract

The literature is divided on the expected effects of increased competition and consolidation in the financial sector on the supply of credit to relationship borrowers. This paper tests whether policy changes fostering competition and consolidation in U.S. banking helped or harmed entrepreneurs. We find that the rate of new incorporations increases following deregulation of branching restrictions, and that deregulation reduces the negative effect of concentration on new incorporations. We also find the formation of new incorporations increases as the share of small banks decreases, suggesting that diversification benefits of size outweigh the possible comparative advantage small banks may have in forging relationships.OVER THE PAST TWO DECADES, the U.S. financial sector has been reshaped by rapid technological innovation and deregulation. In the 1970s, traditional financial intermediaries, mainly banks, provided the lion's share of credit to nonfinancial companies. At that time, banks had the advantage because they were protected from competitive pressures; price competition was limited by Regulation Q, and entry into banking markets was limited by restrictions on in-state branching and interstate banking.All of this changed over the past 25 years. Starting in the latter half of the 1970s, the U.S. banking system began to be reshaped, both by technological innovations and by the removal of many of these constraining regulations. In the early 1980s, for example, interest rate ceilings were largely removed, allowing banks to compete more vigorously for funds. New technologies like the automated teller machine also enhanced competition within banking, and innovations such as the cash management account offered by nonbank financial companies enhanced competitive pressures from outside the industry. By the end of the 1980s, banks had lost substantial ground to nonbank financial institutions and capital markets; commercial paper and bonds, for example, now exceed bank loans in importance~Figure 1!.During the same period, restrictions on banks' ability to expand into new markets were lifted by state-level legislative initiatives allowing both branching across the state and allowing interstate banking-that is, cross-state

Banking Market Structure, Creation and Activity of Firms: Early Evidence for Cooperatives in the Italian Case

“…By contrast, a U-shaped relationship emerges for cooperatives: this seems to indicate that active cooperatives in the market benefit from more intense banking competition, even though it produces negative effects when too exasperated. This result is in accordance with those studies, such as Black and Strahan (2002), which present evidence in favour to the beneficial economic effects that firms can enjoy from bank competition.…”

“…This same negative impact of market power is claimed by Guzman (2000): in a model of capital accumulation, the author shows that a monopolistic bank -compared to a competitive banking sector -produces a depressing effect on capital accumulation. Empirical support to this approach is provided by Black and Strahan (2002), Deidda and Fattouh (2002), Beck et al (2004), and Claessens and Laeven (2005), only to quote a few.…”

Household wealth inequality, entrepreneurs’ financial constraints, and the great recession: evidence from the Kauffman Firm Survey

“…Another set of analyses have linked the development of capital markets to entrepreneurship. Black and Strahan (2002), Cetorelli and Strahan (2006), and Kerr and Nanda (2009), for instance, find large increases in startup activity subsequent to the US inter-state branch banking deregulation. Fisman and Love (2004) show that startup firms struggle with overcoming weaknesses in financial market development.…”

Credit constraints and investment in human capital: Training evidence from transition economies

“…This is true not just for one de…nition of credit constraints, but for a range of such de…nitions. 12 5 Addressing the Endogeneity of Financing Constraints…”