2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11187-011-9399-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Entrepreneurial processes in social contexts: how are they different, if at all?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
356
2
34

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 362 publications
(434 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
10
356
2
34
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in this regard, there is no consensus among academics. While Rodgers [95] found that firms with SEO have a risk tolerance over any other entrepreneurial firm, Spence et al [53] and Gawel [1] indicate that risk taking exists but is calculated and limited, and Lumpkin et al [41] argue that, in this type of firm, risks tend to be avoided. In any case, as stressed by Murillo-Luna et al [136], a proactive strategy towards sustainable development involves the implementation of new processes, technologies and systems, and this always carries a certain risk due to the uncertainty of its eventual impact on organizational performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in this regard, there is no consensus among academics. While Rodgers [95] found that firms with SEO have a risk tolerance over any other entrepreneurial firm, Spence et al [53] and Gawel [1] indicate that risk taking exists but is calculated and limited, and Lumpkin et al [41] argue that, in this type of firm, risks tend to be avoided. In any case, as stressed by Murillo-Luna et al [136], a proactive strategy towards sustainable development involves the implementation of new processes, technologies and systems, and this always carries a certain risk due to the uncertainty of its eventual impact on organizational performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature on sustainable entrepreneurship has another line of research centered on the so-called social entrepreneurship, with contributions that focused primarily on the social aspect of sustainability (e.g., Prahalad and Hammond [37], Nicolls [38], Hall et al [22], De Clercq and Voronov [20], Apetrei et al [39], Ferreira et al [40]); that is, on non-economic aspects of work, like social improvement and welfare [41]. According to Zahra et al [42], this type of entrepreneurship refers to all activities and processes aimed at identifying and exploiting those opportunities that improve social wealth through the creation of social capital, social change or attention to social needs.…”
Section: Towards a Sustainable Entrepreneurship Framework: Contributimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefor governments are faced with many problems that they are not well equipped to deal with such rising social needs and issues (Lumpkin et al, 2013). Also, it is believed that the social entrepreneurship represents a new structure and ideology that can capture social, economic and environmental values for society's development (Nga & Shamuganathan, 2010;Noruzi et al, 2010;Zebrowski, 2009;Davari & Farokhmanesh, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Les organisations d'ES sont considérées comme des organisations novatrices et entrepreneuriales (Lumpkin, Moss, Gras, Kato, et Amezcua, 2013). Elles ont les capacités dynamiques nécessaires à la survie d'une organisation hybride (Smith et Lewis, 2011).…”
Section: Hybridite Orientation Entrepreneuriale Et Orientation Vers unclassified