Entrepreneurial orientation and knowledge management: comparing configurations of native and immigrant entrepreneurial firms

Abstract

PurposeKnowledge-intensive entrepreneurial firms succeed when they can better marshal their knowledge resources into productive advantages, necessitating entrepreneurial orientation (EO) and knowledge management (KM) processes of knowledge acquisition, application, conversion and protection. However, configurations of EO and KM processes are unaccounted for in extant theory, and the differences between the operating context of knowledge-intensive entrepreneurial firms are unclear. Therefore, this study investigates the configurational combination of EO and KM processes in two different contexts as native and immigrant entrepreneurial firms.Design/methodology/approachDrawing on the knowledge-based theory, the authors apply fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and necessity analysis of QCA (NCA) to data from Malaysian native (N = 185) and immigrant (N = 146) service-oriented entrepreneurial firms.FindingsThe results demonstrate that immigrant entrepreneurial firms’ performance relies on knowledge processes of knowledge acquisition and application to ensure intelligent effectuation of EO; but for native entrepreneurial firms, the critical knowledge processes for performance success are knowledge conversion and protection. The NCA suggests that EO is critical for both firms; however, conjunctional causations differ based on KM processes.Originality/valueThis study enriches the emerging knowledge-based theory of the entrepreneurial-oriented firm by advancing the theory and conversation by revealing how EO, KM processes and context link in which the profile of the EO–performance relationship is configurationally dependent. The study advances the knowledge-based theory of entrepreneurially-oriented firms to account for entrepreneurship in context.

Leveraging Strategic Orientations in Achieving a Competitive Advantage Among Msmes: A Cross-Country Marketing Analysis

“…It guides market entry and product innovation (Pinto & Rua, 2023), while also improving the business performance (Lou, Chen, Yin, Zhang, & Yu, 2022). Several previous studies had proved the role of self-efficacy in fostering a pioneering outlook (Mostafiz, Hughes, Simeonova, & Sambasivan, 2023) and the importance of flexibility in the entrepreneurial orientation (Salem, Elbaz, Al-Alawi, Alkathiri, & Elkhwesky, 2023). They also explored the interaction between strategic orientations and entrepreneurial orientation (Baskoro, Radzi, & Omar, 2022) and the impact of entrepreneurial orientation on organizational absorptive capacity and sustainable development (Mao, Wang, & Yi, 2021).…”