Entrepreneurial Drivers for the Development of the Circular Business Model: The Role of Academic Spin-Off

Abstract

Circular Economy represents today a new economic paradigm based on the environment and on the recovery of material. The pursuit of this change can be implemented through different policies with a top-down or bottom-up approach. Following the latter approach Spin-Offs, typically defined as “Science Based” companies, represent an alternative tool to promote technology transfer. In other words, they represent a bridge between the research and the production system. This part of the study is part of a larger and more complex project whose objective is to verify whether the development of research Spin-Offs and in particular academics, operating in the environment sector, or more generally sustainable, facilitate the transition from the classic model of linear economics to the innovative model of circular economics. The aim of the paper is to investigate how spin off enterprises can be a driver for the development of a Circular Business Model and to facilitate the transition from the classical model of linear economy to the new model of Circular Economy. At the methodological level, a multiple compared analysis was made between a sample of firms located in Lazio Region- Italy, that operates in the area of green economy Smart Specialization Strategy (S3). The analysis shows a rapid succession of variables that lead to the identification of four scenarios, deriving from the interconnection of the outcome: “closed loop”, “open loop” and the presence or absence of Circular Economy practices. The result confirms that the Academic Spin-Offs can be a driver of Circular economy, as long as that fall within the IV scenario, characterized by the interconnection of an open loop system that works in a circular approach. The “High valorization of waste” represents the discriminant in this scenario, which allows to activate a cascade system in a multi-stakeholder perspective.

Industry 4.0 and circular economy: An exploratory analysis of academic and practitioners' perspectives

“…For instance, according to Ramakrishna, Ngowi, Jager, and Awuzie (2020), this role can be played by universities. Especially, as defined by Poponi, Arcese, Mosconi, and Arezzo di Trifiletti (2020), technology transfer and the role of a bridge between research and the production system are played by spin‐offs defined as ‘Science‐Based’ companies.…”

Business Models Amid Changes in Regulation and Environment: The Case of Finland–Russia

“…Furthermore, it is important to study those theories in the context of high physical asset intensive (and low intellectual capital intensive) industries. Pieroni et al [40] also call for more experimentation and learning from practice, and Poponi et al [41] call for more generalizable models in environmentally sustainable business model design and innovation. The new situation, where bigger countries aim to produce more locally and import less, should deserve further research from the angle of international logistics companies.…”

“…Furthermore, the increased competition and new entrants in railway traffic due to the changing business environment between Finland and Russia suggest that the companies related to this field should find ways to cope with the introduction of numerous new actors. Furthermore, environmentally sustainable business models, such as those based on circular economy practices, require extensive cooperation between separate actors [41].…”

New Challenges for Sustainable Organizations in Light of Agenda 2030 for Sustainability

“…Bonacci et al [16] focus on the healthcare sector by showing that a good organizational climate becomes a necessary (though not sufficient) condition to create an expert, structured, and balanced workforce (organizational innovation), capable of achieving great performances (working excellence) aligned with the organization's interests and objectives. Poponi et al [17] deal with spin-offs, typically defined as "Science Based" companies, and their role in the transition from the classic model of linear economics to the innovative model of circular economics. Cappa et al [18] deal with cultural heritage organizations.…”