2008
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.77.034610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Entrance channel dependence of quasifission in reactions formingTh220

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
56
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
6
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To define the smooth trends in quasifission, a large number of MAD measurements have been selected from measurements recently made at the ANU [3][4][5][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. By investigating empirically those nuclear stucture variables that affect quasifission, the ultimate goal to have a reliable predictive model of quasifission, including all relevant physics, will be a step closer.…”
Section: Mass-angle Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To define the smooth trends in quasifission, a large number of MAD measurements have been selected from measurements recently made at the ANU [3][4][5][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. By investigating empirically those nuclear stucture variables that affect quasifission, the ultimate goal to have a reliable predictive model of quasifission, including all relevant physics, will be a step closer.…”
Section: Mass-angle Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quasifission mass-angle distributions (MAD) first measured at GSI in the 1980s [2,5] showed that quasifission timescales could often be shorter than the rotation time of ∼10 −20 s. However, subsequently only a few measurements [6,7] were made until recent years, when an extensive series of experiments (using the Australian National University Heavy Ion Accelerator Facility and CUBE spectrometer) were carried out [3,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. The kinematic coincidence technique used in the measurements [2,3,17] provides direct information on the mass-ratio of the fragments at scission; thus, the data are represented in terms of mass ratio M R , rather than pre-or According to the characteristics of the MAD (minimum mass yield at symmetry, mass-angle correlation with peak yield at symmetry, and no significant mass-angle correlation), they are assigned as type MAD1, MAD2 and MAD3 respectively [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usual experimental observables to investigate the quasifission process include, in addition to the fragment mass distribution, the kinetic energy of the fragments [13] and the scattering angle [6,51]. Figure 10 shows the evolution of the scattering angle in 40 Ca+ 238 U at E c.m.…”
Section: Quasi-fission Within the Tdhf Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%