2014
DOI: 10.7158/c14-004.2014.12.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Entrance changes in the Snowy River estuary in response to environmental flow releases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As described under 'Hydrologic response', the mean water level was raised by both EFRs although the change in the 2010 EFR was very small. The bulk movement of water through the estuary from the river to the ocean resulted in much stronger ebb currents and weaker flood currents, biasing sediment transport to scouring, as described above and in Hinwood and McLean (2014). This bulk water movement dominated the salt transport, driving the saltwater downstream, as described in the next section.…”
Section: Hydrodynamic Responsementioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As described under 'Hydrologic response', the mean water level was raised by both EFRs although the change in the 2010 EFR was very small. The bulk movement of water through the estuary from the river to the ocean resulted in much stronger ebb currents and weaker flood currents, biasing sediment transport to scouring, as described above and in Hinwood and McLean (2014). This bulk water movement dominated the salt transport, driving the saltwater downstream, as described in the next section.…”
Section: Hydrodynamic Responsementioning
confidence: 77%
“…Each environmental flow had been preceded by a larger fresh flow and consequently the entrance channel dimensions are likely to have been close to equilibrium for the environmental flows before they reached the estuary. Enlargements of the entrance channel were predominantly by scouring in the intertidal zone, due to a combination of wave action and the lesser consolidation of the intertidal sands (Hinwood & McLean 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is not likely to be true but is a tolerable and necessary approximation as there is no robust method to determine the likely long‐term changes in wave climate, nor the transient response of the coastal system to changing wave climate and sea level. The consequences of the likely errors may be investigated by creating attractor maps with changed parameters (e.g., Hinwood et al, ). Resistance parameters, f and K , and sediment transport parameters, u c and m , are hydraulic constants that are properties determined by bed material and the depth. The ocean tidal period and amplitude are assumed constant, as changes in ocean depths due to climate change will be negligible. The entrance breadth has been assumed to have the constant value B = 150 m. This value has been based on the typical value observed when a period of consistently low flows follows a bank‐full scouring flood (Hinwood & McLean, ). Other breadth values are generated by different river flow histories but the history adopted provides the fastest route to entrance closure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• The hydrodynamic module was validated against a well-validated earlier model (Hinwood and McLean, 2001). • Finally, both the hydrodynamic and sediment modules have been calibrated against field data (Hinwood and McLean, 2014;Hinwood et al, 2012), including reproducing the O' Brien (1931Brien ( , 1969) entrance area-tidal prism relationship.…”
Section: Model Validation and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%