2018
DOI: 10.1080/17588928.2018.1521386
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Entrainment enhances theta oscillations and improves episodic memory

Abstract: Neural oscillations in the theta band have been linked to episodic memory, but it is unclear whether activity patterns that give rise to theta play a causal role in episodic retrieval. Here, we used rhythmic auditory and visual stimulation to entrain neural oscillations to assess whether theta activity contributes to successful memory retrieval. In two separate experiments, human subjects studied words and were subsequently tested on memory for the words ('item recognition') and the context in which each had b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
43
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
3
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One possible explanation for this discrepancy is that while rTMS may engender certain oscillatory patterns at the site of stimulation, there exists some general latency after the end of the last TMS pulse for that entrainment to emerge. Thus, rTMS applied to a region during the time it is engaging in task-essential processing will disrupt performance, while stimulation trains of appropriate frequency applied prior to that processing can enhance performance, possibly due to entrainment of functional oscillations prior to the essential cortical activity (Hanslmayr et al, 2014;Roberts et al, 2018). The fMRI evidence suggests the essential processing in parietal cortex needed for the DRAT occurred during the delay period, with rTMS applied in that period injecting random noise that disturbed performance, while delay period 5 Hz rTMS to DLPFC may result in pre-processing activity-possibly through entrainment of theta frequency-that may enhance processing there during the subsequent probe period.…”
Section: Site-and Timing-specific Rtms Effects On Wm Manipulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible explanation for this discrepancy is that while rTMS may engender certain oscillatory patterns at the site of stimulation, there exists some general latency after the end of the last TMS pulse for that entrainment to emerge. Thus, rTMS applied to a region during the time it is engaging in task-essential processing will disrupt performance, while stimulation trains of appropriate frequency applied prior to that processing can enhance performance, possibly due to entrainment of functional oscillations prior to the essential cortical activity (Hanslmayr et al, 2014;Roberts et al, 2018). The fMRI evidence suggests the essential processing in parietal cortex needed for the DRAT occurred during the delay period, with rTMS applied in that period injecting random noise that disturbed performance, while delay period 5 Hz rTMS to DLPFC may result in pre-processing activity-possibly through entrainment of theta frequency-that may enhance processing there during the subsequent probe period.…”
Section: Site-and Timing-specific Rtms Effects On Wm Manipulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, these findings converge to reveal that the larger LPC magnitudes were related to higher proportions of hits on the memory test and with faster response times for recollection-related items of high confidence hits with correct source memory (Addante et al, 2011;Addante et al, 2012a;Roberts et al, 2018). Hence, the LPC was related to recollection, and the more recollection signal (LPC) a subject had predicted the more likely they were to under-estimate their memory performance via their average DK responses in the metacognitive judgments ( Figure 9); recollection thus led people to exhibit more humble metacognitive self-awareness.…”
Section: Brain-behavior Relationships Between Memory and Metacognitionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Source memory response distributions for recognition of old and new items are displayed in Table 2. Source memory accuracy values were collapsed to include high and low source confidence responses which were then divided by the sum of items receiving a correct and incorrect source response to calculate the proportion (Addante et al, 2012a(Addante et al, , 2012bRoberts et al, 2018). Mean accuracy for source memory was .30 (SD = .19) and was reliably greater than chance, t(55) = 11.78, p < .001.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We then sought to determine whether memory performance was related to the prevalence of theta oscillations given prior findings showing links between theta and memory 22,23 . To investigate this, we computed the difference in theta prevalence during encoding and retrieval for each recording contact in each participant, and during each block (henceforth referred to as "theta difference"; Methods).…”
Section: Mainmentioning
confidence: 99%