1864
DOI: 10.5962/bhl.title.46771
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Entozoa, an introduction to the study of helminthology, with reference more particularly to the internal parasites of man

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1867
1867
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The nematode genus Syphacia Seurat, 1916 (Oxyuridae Cobbold, 1864: Syphaciinae Railliet, 1916) members of which are colloquially often referred to as pinworms (Adamson, 1994; Grear and Hudson, 2011), is a cosmopolitan genus parasitizing rodents. Hugot (1988) separated the genus into three subgenera including Syphacia ( Syphacia ) comprising 14 species, all occurring in Cricetidae Fisher, 1817 or Muridae Illiger, 1811.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nematode genus Syphacia Seurat, 1916 (Oxyuridae Cobbold, 1864: Syphaciinae Railliet, 1916) members of which are colloquially often referred to as pinworms (Adamson, 1994; Grear and Hudson, 2011), is a cosmopolitan genus parasitizing rodents. Hugot (1988) separated the genus into three subgenera including Syphacia ( Syphacia ) comprising 14 species, all occurring in Cricetidae Fisher, 1817 or Muridae Illiger, 1811.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rudolphi's rejection of previous specific names for these two parasites in favour of mystax and marginata was accepted by Diesing (1851) and Cobbold (1864). Leuckart (1876, p. 258) believed that differences in the cervical alae were artificial and due to different methods of fixation; he regarded the ascaridids of both dogs and cats as one species, Ascaris mystax, and this was accepted by Neumann (1892), Moniez (1896) and Stossich (1896).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nucleotide difference between T. ovis ovis and T. asiatica is 13.6% that is lesser than the corresponding difference between T. ovis ovis and T. ovis krabbei . Therefore, based on the present molecular, biological, morphological and intermediate host differences (Lavikainen et al, 2008), the two subspecies could be considered distinct species as T. ovis (Cobbold, 1869) (Ransom, 1913), and Taenia krabbei (Moniez, 1879). Likewise in other taeniid species, e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%