2005
DOI: 10.1051/cocv:2005023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Entire solutions in ${\mathbb{R}}^{2}$ for a class of Allen-Cahn equations

Abstract: We consider a class of semilinear elliptic equations of the form −ε 2 ∆u(x, y) + a(x)W (u(x, y)) = 0, (x, y) ∈ R 2 (0.1) where ε > 0, a : R → R is a periodic, positive function and W : R → R is modeled on the classical two well Ginzburg-Landau potential W (s) = (s 2 − 1) 2. We look for solutions to (0.1) which verify the asymptotic conditions u(x, y) → ±1 as x → ±∞ uniformly with respect to y ∈ R. We show via variational methods that if ε is sufficiently small and a is not constant, then (0.1) admits infinitel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, thanks to the discreteness of the set {F ≤ c * } described by (2.15), as in [6] (see Lemma 3.1) we obtain that if ϕ p (u) < +∞ then, the trajectory y ∈ R → u(·, y) ∈ is bounded. Precisely Lemma 3.2 There exists C > 0 such that if u ∈ M p and (y 1 , y 2 ) ⊂ R then u(·, y 1 ) − u(·, y 2 ) ≤ C ϕ p (u).…”
Section: Minimizing Sequences Of ϕ P On M P : Concentration and Compamentioning
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…First, thanks to the discreteness of the set {F ≤ c * } described by (2.15), as in [6] (see Lemma 3.1) we obtain that if ϕ p (u) < +∞ then, the trajectory y ∈ R → u(·, y) ∈ is bounded. Precisely Lemma 3.2 There exists C > 0 such that if u ∈ M p and (y 1 , y 2 ) ⊂ R then u(·, y 1 ) − u(·, y 2 ) ≤ C ϕ p (u).…”
Section: Minimizing Sequences Of ϕ P On M P : Concentration and Compamentioning
confidence: 87%
“…its Lagrangian does not explicitly depend on y. This implies, as shown in [6], that if u ∈ H is a solution to (1.2) then the Energy function…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To prove Theorem 1.1 we develop a global variational procedure, inspired to the ones introduced in [3,7], which allows us to recover the saddle type solution θ 3 from the minimum of a suitably renormalized action functional (for the use of renormalized functionals in different contexts we also refer to [4][5][6]36] and to the comprehensive recent monograph [37]). We look for minima of the double renormalized functional…”
Section: (W 1)mentioning
confidence: 99%