2022
DOI: 10.3390/cells11111752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enthesis Healing Is Dependent on Scaffold Interphase Morphology—Results from a Rodent Patellar Model

Abstract: The use of multiphasic scaffolds to treat injured tendon-to-bone entheses has shown promising results in vitro. Here, we used two versions of a biphasic silk fibroin scaffold to treat an enthesis defect created in a rat patellar model in vivo. One version presented a mixed transition between the bony and the tendon end of the construct (S-MT) while this transition was abrupt in the second version (S-AT). At 12 weeks after surgery, the S-MT scaffold promoted better healing of the injured enthesis, with minimal … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the autologous graft materials used today are successful, the re-rupture rate is still too high (overall 4.8% depending on the surgery technique) [ 50 ], and therefore, the orthopedic research community is striving to find a tissue-engineered construct as an option to overcome the problem of limited autograft availability. In the past few years, new approaches and techniques, such as modification of decellularized native enthesis tissue, silk [ 51 , 52 , 53 ] or polymer based scaffolds [ 25 , 54 ], have been investigated for their reconstruction capabilities for the complete enthesis zone and not only the ligament zone of the ACL, the patellar tendon or the rotator cuff [ 25 , 51 , 52 , 53 ]. The importance of creating multiphasic scaffolds for musculoskeletal interface tissue engineering to achieve functional restoration of injured zonal tissues has increased in past years not only in orthopedics but also in dentistry [ 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the autologous graft materials used today are successful, the re-rupture rate is still too high (overall 4.8% depending on the surgery technique) [ 50 ], and therefore, the orthopedic research community is striving to find a tissue-engineered construct as an option to overcome the problem of limited autograft availability. In the past few years, new approaches and techniques, such as modification of decellularized native enthesis tissue, silk [ 51 , 52 , 53 ] or polymer based scaffolds [ 25 , 54 ], have been investigated for their reconstruction capabilities for the complete enthesis zone and not only the ligament zone of the ACL, the patellar tendon or the rotator cuff [ 25 , 51 , 52 , 53 ]. The importance of creating multiphasic scaffolds for musculoskeletal interface tissue engineering to achieve functional restoration of injured zonal tissues has increased in past years not only in orthopedics but also in dentistry [ 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent decades, biomimetic scaffolds for TBI regeneration have been made from a variety of materials, including natural polymers, synthetic polymers, bioceramics, and composite materials [60][61][62][63][64][65][66]. Collagen is the most commonly used natural polymer due to its prominence in the ECM with minimal host immune response [67,68].…”
Section: Materials For Fabricating Biomimetic Scaffoldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biomaterials have proven to be a more popular method for interfacial tissue repair as they offer a more controllable system without the complexity of cell implantation (i.e., cells are challenging to scale-up production reproducibly for transplant) [ 95 , 96 ]. There are several approaches to biomaterial design for interfacial tissue regeneration including synthetic vs. natural constructs, injectable vs. non-injectable materials, 3D-printed vs. electrospun, degradable vs. non-degradable, and multi-phasic vs. uni-phasic [ 97 104 , 105 ••]. Currently, substantial progress has been made in osteochondral interfacial regeneration with bone using biomaterials, particularly in craniofacial bone defects [ 91 , 97 , 106 109 ].…”
Section: Impact In Discovery and Clinical Translationmentioning
confidence: 99%