There is a strong argument that the study of language is crucial to the study of almost anything. As the most flexible and extensive means of communication that humans possess, language mediates all our social relationships, plays a part in all our social interactions, and is the foundational element of our civilization as a species. The cognitive revolution that took place one hundred thousand years ago, and which marked the evolution of language in homo sapiens, set humankind on a path to intellectual pre-eminence amongst the rest of the animal kingdom. The invention of writing five millennia ago gave our ancestors a reliable means of recording and accruing knowledge, of passing it from generation to generation, and of creating complex and expansive societies. Language, as has often been remarked, is an essential part of what makes us human. Language is also an endlessly complicated phenomenon. The processes that allow a child, with no formal education and with limited input, to learn to speak within two to three years of being born, are still not fully understood, and remain an area of intense academic controversy. Yet despite this complexity, communicative competence is something we nearly all master in the first few years of our life, and which we mostly take for granted throughout adulthood. And it is this paradox of language's complexity and importance versus its familiarity and the instinctive mastery we have over it, that leads to something of an identity complex for Language Studies as a subject. Add to this the fact that because everyone has a practical expertise in it, they also feel they have some sort of theoretical expertise in itat least in so far as making pronouncements about its nature and status goesand the necessity of studying it is considered far less than its importance in all aspects of our life would seem to merit.