2009
DOI: 10.1017/upo9781846157219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enterprising Women and Shipping in the Nineteenth Century

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Berg, ‘Women's property’, pp. 235–7 for the former, and Doe, Enterprising women , pp. 217–19, for the latter.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Berg, ‘Women's property’, pp. 235–7 for the former, and Doe, Enterprising women , pp. 217–19, for the latter.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if railway securities are also considered low risk (although this category includes ordinary and preference shares as well as debentures) we 14 Although canal and shipping shares were not important sectors by the end of the nineteenth century, Table 7 shows women with higher average shareholdings in these sectors in the 1870s. For further discussion of women's investments in ships and canals, see, respectively, Doe (2009) and Hudson (2001). find that 30.6% of women held portfolios with only railway and UK government securities compared with 17,1% of men.…”
Section: [Table 4 Near Here]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In early-nineteenth-century Rochester for example, Mary Ross, a warship builder, won five such contracts. 54 A number were also closely involved, like Taylor, with the Hydrographic Office. Penelope Steel assumed charge of her husband David's chart-making company on his death in 1803 and went on to publish sea charts and the Navy List.…”
Section: Early Victorian Women and The Tools Of Empire 43mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…68 Frances Barnard, the manufacturer of naval warships, named her business 'Mrs Frances Barnard and Sons'. 69 In another telling example, Elizabeth Dent won a legal dispute in 1860 to establish her rights to the business founded by her husband, which had been run by her son Frederick since the former's death in 1853. She changed the firm's name to indicate the fact.…”
Section: Marketing and Women's Occupational Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%