2002
DOI: 10.1257/jel.40.3.739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enterprise Restructuring in Transition: A Quantitative Survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
116
2
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 517 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
116
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The usual disclaimers apply. 18 Two papers that synthesize our knowledge about the effects of privatization (Djankov and Murrell, 2002;Estrin et al, 2009) state that the effect of insider ownership on firm performance is mostly positive in Central and East European countries, but the effect is usually insignificantly different from zero. The only evidence for the effects MEBO privatization in Romania is in Earle and Telegdy (2002), who find that firms transferred to its employees increased labor productivity, but the effect is smaller than of outsider privatization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The usual disclaimers apply. 18 Two papers that synthesize our knowledge about the effects of privatization (Djankov and Murrell, 2002;Estrin et al, 2009) state that the effect of insider ownership on firm performance is mostly positive in Central and East European countries, but the effect is usually insignificantly different from zero. The only evidence for the effects MEBO privatization in Romania is in Earle and Telegdy (2002), who find that firms transferred to its employees increased labor productivity, but the effect is smaller than of outsider privatization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…THE EFFECTS of privatization on firm behavior have stimulated a large amount of research (Djankov and Murrell, 2002;Estrin et al, 2009;Megginson and Netter, 2001), but the selection of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) into privatization programs, which is the precondition of privatization, has received much less attention. Nevertheless, in the recent years there have been a small, but growing number of studies focusing on the motivations of politicians and bureaucrats materialized in decisions about allowing or banning firms to become private, or of sequencing of privatization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Foreign investors may also have better monitoring capabilities, which can help firms to move away from an over-reliance on concentrated ownership (Khanna & Palepu 2000). Djankov and Murrell (2002) find in their extensive survey of the research on transition economies that when investment funds, foreigners, and other outsiders become influential owners, ten times as much restructuring takes place in former SOEs. Young et al (2008) suggest the important role of foreign ownership such as foreign institutional investors in institutional reform.…”
Section: Ownership Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand there are evidences that indicate significant increases in the financial performance of companies that changed their type of ownership (Djankov & Murrell, 2002;Megginson & Netter, 2001;Wright, Buck, T. & Filatotchev, 2002 3). Collectively owned firms, state-owned but operate as private.…”
Section: Type Of Ownershipmentioning
confidence: 99%