Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to introduce cybernetic systems in defence management applications, to meet new challenges of the information society and use of system modelling for decision making. Design/methodology/approach -The paper defines basic terms for understanding the complexity of the defence management applications, which is simplified using input-output modelling. Findings -The paper illustrates the interdisciplinary nature of cybernetics, systems and management sciences. The defence system is analysed and a general input-output model for defence system development recommended. Research limitations/implications -New data technology and data availability provide perspective for applied research using scientific approach. Practical implications -Cybernetic systems for defence provide analytical modelling for management applications. Originality/value -The paper presents a concept and empirical evidence for defence system analysis and a new way of thinking that affects defence planning and defence management. A cybernetic, systemic and input-output methodology provides solutions for defence management applications.
IntroductionDuring the last two decades, the defence sector, defence strategies and policies, and military academic study have changed considerably ways of thinking about information sharing, empirical analysis and its use in decision-making processes and for management control by the use of modern technology, information and communication systems development (Skyttner, 2005;Sandler and Hartley, 2007). These defence management applications can be considered as one of the challenging issues of the information society and cybernetic systems in management applications (Rudall and Mann, 2008a, b).This paper contributes to the analysis of cybernetic systems in defence management applications. Informational asymmetry can exist for decision-makers in defence systems and in the implementation of defence procurements, in particular the relationships between a government and a defence contractor with possible cost-sharing and rent extraction from the government (Liston-Heyes, 1995). The presence of rent-seeking activities in conduction of defence procurements has demanded a greater transparency, elimination and opening-up dual-use procurement markets for defence and civil goods and services (Martin et al., 1999). Moreover, the concept of the defence industrial base, operational measures for implementation of the defence industrial base, and defence