2021
DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.752112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enterprise Food Fraud in China: Key Factors Identification From Social Co-governance Perspective

Abstract: Food fraud not only exacerbates human public health risks but also threatens the business development of food and related industries. Therefore, how to curb food fraud effectively becomes a crucial issue for governments, industries, and consumers. Previous studies have demonstrated that enterprise food fraud is subject to joint influences of factor at various hierarchical levels within a complex system of stakeholders. To address enterprise food fraud, it is necessary to identify the key such factors and eluci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, Fassam et al [207] reported on four supply chain drivers for food fraud including lack of trust among supply chain actors, opportunistic behaviors by supply chain partners, inadequate governance of the supply chain, and complexity of the supply chain. Niu et al [208] further investigated the food fraud key influencing factors and their interrelationships in an emerging food market-China-by using the DEMATELbased analytic network process (DANP) and showed that the identified key cluster was government regulation, social governance, and detection techniques. A summary of food fraud types and ways that consumers may acknowledge them is provided in Table 4.…”
Section: Food Fraudmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Fassam et al [207] reported on four supply chain drivers for food fraud including lack of trust among supply chain actors, opportunistic behaviors by supply chain partners, inadequate governance of the supply chain, and complexity of the supply chain. Niu et al [208] further investigated the food fraud key influencing factors and their interrelationships in an emerging food market-China-by using the DEMATELbased analytic network process (DANP) and showed that the identified key cluster was government regulation, social governance, and detection techniques. A summary of food fraud types and ways that consumers may acknowledge them is provided in Table 4.…”
Section: Food Fraudmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relevant studies have pointed out that government regulation, social governance and detection technology are the key factors affecting the food fraud problem in China (Niu et al, 2021).…”
Section: Impact Of the External Institutional Environment Of The Supp...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relevant studies have pointed out that government regulation, social governance and detection technology are the key factors affecting the food fraud problem in China (Niu et al ., 2021). Effective government regulation can promote cooperatives to manage farmers' green production, which in turn effectively encourages farmers to take the initiative to participate in green production and improve the quality and safety of agricultural products (Teng et al ., 2022).…”
Section: Agricultural Quality and Safety Credit Regulation Influence ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Fassam et al [196] reported on four supply chain drivers for food fraud including lack of trust between supply chain actors, opportunistic behaviors by supply chain partners, inadequate governance of the supply chain and complexity of the supply chain. Niu et al [197] further investigated the food fraud key influencing factors and their interrelationships in an emerging food market -China, by using the DEMATEL-based analytic network process (DANP) and showed that the identified key cluster was government regulation, social governance, and detection techniques. A summary of food fraud types and ways that consumers may acknowledge them are seen in Table 4.…”
Section: Food Fraudmentioning
confidence: 99%