2001
DOI: 10.1099/00207713-51-4-1567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enterococcus haemoperoxidus sp. nov. and Enterococcus moraviensis sp. nov., isolated from water.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, novel enterococcal species have been identified in recent years from water (38)(39)(40) and fecal (41,42) samples. While the relative abundances of novel enterococcal species in water samples are unknown, these results indicate that there is a need for further investigation of enterococcal diversity in both fecal and environmental samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, novel enterococcal species have been identified in recent years from water (38)(39)(40) and fecal (41,42) samples. While the relative abundances of novel enterococcal species in water samples are unknown, these results indicate that there is a need for further investigation of enterococcal diversity in both fecal and environmental samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some isolates were clearly identified as either E. casseliflavus or E. flavescens, while other isolates were positive for both sets of primers. In addition, the species E. haemoperoxidus and E. moraviensis were not included in the multiplex PCR because sodA sequences from multiple isolates were not available for comparison (20). Moreover, although E. seriolicida and E. solitarius may eventually be reclassified into other genera, they are presently classified as enterococci and were included in the analysis (21,23).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eleven isolates, obtained from Lisbon Veterinarian Faculty, were reported as dog-infecting strains. When phenotypic and molecular methods (6,33,35) The species E. villorum (45), E. haemoperoxidus and E. moraviensis (40), E. porcinus and E. ratti (43), and E. pallens and E. gilvus (44) were not included in the study, since they have been proposed and accepted as new species more recently.…”
Section: Microorganismsmentioning
confidence: 99%