2010
DOI: 10.1021/es101266k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enteric Virus Infection Risk from Intrusion of Sewage into a Drinking Water Distribution Network

Abstract: Contaminants from the soil surrounding drinking water distribution systems are thought to not enter the drinking water when sufficient internal pressure is maintained. Pressure transients may cause short intervals of negative pressure, and the soil near drinking water pipes often contains fecal material due to the proximity of sewage lines, so that a pressure event may cause intrusion of pathogens. This paper presents a risk model for predicting intrusion and dilution of viruses and their transport to consumer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
55
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The pathogen densities in sewage were not quantified in this study; therefore, the pathogen dose was estimated using norovirus densities from the literature. Norovirus density in raw sewage was modeled as a lognormal distribution with parameters ( ϭ 10.8; ϭ 6 [genome copies liter Ϫ1 ]) corresponding to a median density of 4.94 ϫ 10 4 genome copies liter Ϫ1 and censored at 10 8 genome copies liter Ϫ1 (46). The volume of water ingested was also modeled as a lognormal distribution with parameters ( ϭ 2.92 ml; ϭ 1.43 ml) corresponding to a mean volume of 18.6 ml.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pathogen densities in sewage were not quantified in this study; therefore, the pathogen dose was estimated using norovirus densities from the literature. Norovirus density in raw sewage was modeled as a lognormal distribution with parameters ( ϭ 10.8; ϭ 6 [genome copies liter Ϫ1 ]) corresponding to a median density of 4.94 ϫ 10 4 genome copies liter Ϫ1 and censored at 10 8 genome copies liter Ϫ1 (46). The volume of water ingested was also modeled as a lognormal distribution with parameters ( ϭ 2.92 ml; ϭ 1.43 ml) corresponding to a mean volume of 18.6 ml.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the contribution of distribution systems to waterborne illness under non-outbreak conditions is not well understood. Risk assessment models have suggested distribution system problems as a potential risk factor for sporadic gastrointestinal illness (GII) (Lambertini et al 2012; McInnis 2004; Teunis et al 2010). Such models, however, typically rely on several assumptions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During short-term drought conditions accompanied by increased water demand by tourists (Challenge 5), all options were vulnerable to possible drinking water shortage, saltwater ingress to groundwater, and ingress contamination in distribution water (Charles et al, 2010;Teunis et al, 2010), depending on the degree of drought. However, the impacts may be less severe for the alternative options due to the reduced water demand from the WW/RR elements (Kinstedt, 2012;The Green Centre, 2014).…”
Section: Vulnerabilities and Robustnessmentioning
confidence: 99%