2011
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.84.032306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Entanglement transitions in random definite particle states

Abstract: Entanglement within qubits are studied for the subspace of definite particle states or definite number of up spins. A transition from an algebraic decay of entanglement within two qubits with the total number $N$ of qubits, to an exponential one when the number of particles is increased from two to three is studied in detail. In particular the probability that the concurrence is non-zero is calculated using statistical methods and shown to agree with numerical simulations. Further entanglement within a block o… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(52 reference statements)
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2), and for L 1 + L 2 > L/2, the density matrix is rank deficient.Whereas the critical case as far as this transition goes is at L 1 + L 2 = L/2 − 1 when the density of states of ρ 12 does not diverge at zero. While the rank of the density matrix mattered in the case of an entanglement transition observed for definite-particle states recently [46], it seems to be not exactly the case here, as there is a case when the density of states of ρ 12 is bounded away from zero, but its partial transpose has a significant measure of negative eigenvalues and is predominantly NPT.…”
Section: A Model For the Shifted Semicirclesmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…(2), and for L 1 + L 2 > L/2, the density matrix is rank deficient.Whereas the critical case as far as this transition goes is at L 1 + L 2 = L/2 − 1 when the density of states of ρ 12 does not diverge at zero. While the rank of the density matrix mattered in the case of an entanglement transition observed for definite-particle states recently [46], it seems to be not exactly the case here, as there is a case when the density of states of ρ 12 is bounded away from zero, but its partial transpose has a significant measure of negative eigenvalues and is predominantly NPT.…”
Section: A Model For the Shifted Semicirclesmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Another example is that of definite particle states. This shows algebraic to exponential decay of entanglement when the number of particles exceed the size of two subsystems [63]. For both these cases, discord and geometric discord between two qubits in a tripartite system goes to zero as the size of the third subsystem is increased.…”
Section: Scaling With Planck Volumementioning
confidence: 88%
“…This follows since a i ∼ 1/ √ L. As v = O(1), the concurrence (which is proportional to |z| − √ vy) in promoted two-particle states is always in a fine balance between the two competing terms |z| and √ y. In contrast, for generic two-particle states, the order of √ y is 1/L which is much larger than the order of |z| which is 1/L 3/2 , resulting in the probability of nonzero concurrence scaling as 1/ √ L [17]. The probability of finding any two spins entangled when the system is in a promoted two-particle state, i.e., P (C > 0) is now estimated.…”
Section: P-4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For generic random two-particle states, v = O(1), y ∼ 1/L 2 , |z| 2 ∼ 4/L 3 and |z| 2 = (2/π) |z| 2 . Thus, the negative term in the pre-concurrence 2(|z| − √ vy) is typically larger than the positive term, thus resulting in the probability of a positive concurrence decreasing with increasing L as 1/ √ L (see [17] for calculations). However, for two-particle states promoted from oneparticle states obeying i a i = 0, it is straightforward to show using a ij = (a i + a j )/ √ L − 2 that, up to the leading order, y ≈ (a 1 +a 2 ) 2 /L, z ≈ (1+La 1 a 2 )/L, v ≈ 1.…”
Section: P-4mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation