2018
DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.8b01884
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Entanglement Reduction Induced by Geometrical Confinement in Polymer Thin Films

Abstract: We report simulation results on melts of entangled linear polymers confined in a freestanding thin film. We study how the geometric constraints imposed by the confinement alter the entanglement state of the system compared to the equivalent bulk system using various observables. We find that the confinement compresses the chain conformation uniaxially, decreasing the volume pervaded by the chain, which in turn reduces the number of the accessible inter-chain contact that could lead to entanglements. This local… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(102 reference statements)
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, there are two main factors that contribute to the nanoconfinement of free‐standing films, the finite‐size effect of a polymer chain and the interface or free surface effect. The finite size effect is related to the diminishing degree of entanglements as a polymer film approaches a thickness of similar size scale to the polymer chain end‐to‐end distance . The free surface effect is vital for thin films as the volume to surface area ratio diminishes until the film becomes dominated by the air–polymer interface (a highly mobile layer) rather than the bulk.…”
Section: Glass Transition For Polymersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, there are two main factors that contribute to the nanoconfinement of free‐standing films, the finite‐size effect of a polymer chain and the interface or free surface effect. The finite size effect is related to the diminishing degree of entanglements as a polymer film approaches a thickness of similar size scale to the polymer chain end‐to‐end distance . The free surface effect is vital for thin films as the volume to surface area ratio diminishes until the film becomes dominated by the air–polymer interface (a highly mobile layer) rather than the bulk.…”
Section: Glass Transition For Polymersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The finite size effect is related to the diminishing degree of entanglements as a polymer film approaches a thickness of similar size scale to the polymer chain end-to-end distance. [112] The free surface effect is vital for thin films as the volume to surface area ratio diminishes until the film becomes dominated by the air-polymer interface (a highly mobile layer) rather than the bulk. For the free-standing films, because of the finite-size and free surface effect, the T g decreases with film thickness.…”
Section: Nanoconfinement Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…this behavior is expected to become considerably less realistic since disentanglement and a greater degree of chain swelling are eventually expected 9,66 . Generally if the parameters of a coarse-grained model are changed (e.g.…”
Section: Chain Bond Orientation Correlation Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To complicate matters, the properties of such nanometer-thin polymer films tend to deviate from their bulk properties due to an increasing contribution of the polymer interface 6 , 7 . This accompanies a phenomena known as the finite size effect, which describes the geometrical constraints that occur when the thickness of a polymer film is of the same length scale as the dimensions of an individual polymer coil, characterized by its polymer chain end-to-end distance ( R ee ) 8 , 9 . A prime example of such a thickness-dependent property is the glass transition phenomena in polystyrene (PS) 10 13 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%