2006
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.96.030405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Entanglement of Remote Atomic Qubits

Abstract: We report observations of entanglement of two remote atomic qubits, achieved by generating an entangled state of an atomic qubit and a single photon at site A, transmitting the photon to site B in an adjacent laboratory through an optical fiber, and converting the photon into an atomic qubit. Entanglement of the two remote atomic qubits is inferred by performing, locally, quantum state transfer of each of the atomic qubits onto a photonic qubit and subsequent measurement of polarization correlations in violati… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

3
179
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 247 publications
(182 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
179
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Through appropriate optical manipulation, both squeezing and entanglement of this collective macroscopic spin state have been demonstrated ͑Kuzmich et al, 1997͑Kuzmich et al, , 2000Hald et al, 1999;Geremia et al, 2004͒, as well as entanglement of spatially separated atomic ensembles ͑Julsgaard et Chaneliére et al, 2005;Chou et al, 2005;Matsukevich et al, 2006͒. Decoherence is a critical factor which limits the ability to generate squeezing and entanglement in atomic systems. One might expect that since spin-squeezed and entangled atomic ensembles contain a large number N of atoms, the decoherence rate of such systems would scale as N␥, where ␥ is the single-atom decay rate.…”
Section: Spin Epr and Atomsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through appropriate optical manipulation, both squeezing and entanglement of this collective macroscopic spin state have been demonstrated ͑Kuzmich et al, 1997͑Kuzmich et al, , 2000Hald et al, 1999;Geremia et al, 2004͒, as well as entanglement of spatially separated atomic ensembles ͑Julsgaard et Chaneliére et al, 2005;Chou et al, 2005;Matsukevich et al, 2006͒. Decoherence is a critical factor which limits the ability to generate squeezing and entanglement in atomic systems. One might expect that since spin-squeezed and entangled atomic ensembles contain a large number N of atoms, the decoherence rate of such systems would scale as N␥, where ␥ is the single-atom decay rate.…”
Section: Spin Epr and Atomsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This breakthrough laid the groundwork for several further advances towards the realization of a longdistance, distributed network of atomic qubits, linear optical elements and single-photon detectors [4,5,6,7,8]. A seminal proposal for universal quantum computation with a similar set of physical resources has also been made [9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, its evolution conditioned on the recorded measurement history of the signal field in our protocol, ideally results in a single atomic excitation. However, without exception all prior experiments with atomic ensembles did not have sufficiently long coherence times to implement such a feedback protocol [2,3,4,5,6,7,22,23,24]. In earlier work quantum feedback protocols have demonstrated control of non-classical states of light [25] and…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although a bit of quantum information (qubit) can be stored in a single two-level system, it can be expedient to instead use long-lived collective spin excitations of an atomic ensemble 12 . The ensemble can then be viewed as a 'macroatom' , whose excitations are quantized spin waves (magnons), such that transitions between its energy levels (magnon number states) correspond to highly directional (superradiant 20 ) photon emission or absorption 6,7,[12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] . …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%