2014
DOI: 10.1007/jhep01(2014)180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Entanglement entropy for probe branes

Abstract: We give a prescription for calculating the entanglement entropy in holographic probe brane systems by systematically taking the leading order backreaction of the probe brane into account. We find a simple compact double integral formula, which is insensitive to many details of the backreaction, most notably the internal space or the non-metric fields sourced by the probe. We validate our method by comparing to exact results in solvable toy models. We also determine the entanglement entropies for a sphere and a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
81
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
(176 reference statements)
11
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The result of this calculation is shown in figure 3 for T b L 2 = 2 and T b L 2 = 0.1. The numeric result in this figure coincides, within numeric accuracy, with the prediction from hydrodynamics [35] 22) where the value is corrected by the volume of R 2 . The radial profile σ −1 (r) is used to obtain σ 0 (r) from (4.19).…”
Section: Conductivity Of the Uv-complete Solutionsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The result of this calculation is shown in figure 3 for T b L 2 = 2 and T b L 2 = 0.1. The numeric result in this figure coincides, within numeric accuracy, with the prediction from hydrodynamics [35] 22) where the value is corrected by the volume of R 2 . The radial profile σ −1 (r) is used to obtain σ 0 (r) from (4.19).…”
Section: Conductivity Of the Uv-complete Solutionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…From the point of view of the model, one obvious generalisation is to allow a finite codimension of the brane, in a similar way to the actions used in [22,23].…”
Section: Jhep04(2014)042mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We conclude that the critical mass at the transition is m * l ≈ 1.32 in this example. The 11 Curiously the functional combination we see in Y1 also appears in the exact solution for the slipping mode in the supersymmetric version recently studied in [20,21]. In fact to linear order in m our solution agrees with their solution for the slipping mode.…”
Section: Numerical Solutionssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…For quantities calculated directly from the on-shell action, it is not necessary to go beyond the probe limit N f N c in which backreaction is neglected. This is not the case for flavour corrections to the EE, which are a topic of recent interest [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. However, [13], building on [18], found a shortcut to the problem which does not require computing the backreaction.…”
Section: Jhep03(2016)172mentioning
confidence: 99%