2022
DOI: 10.22331/q-2022-07-07-760
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Entangled subspaces and generic local state discrimination with pre-shared entanglement

Abstract: Walgate and Scott have determined the maximum number of generic pure quantum states that can be unambiguously discriminated by an LOCC measurement [Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 41:375305, 08 2008]. In this work, we determine this number in a more general setting in which the local parties have access to pre-shared entanglement in the form of a resource state. We find that, for an arbitrary pure resource state, this number is equal to the Krull dimension of (the closure of) the set of pur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(67 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although, it was not mentioned directly, the transpose of these vectors are nothing but the rows of the well known Vandermonde matrix (see appendix B). Following this work the usage of Vandermonde matrices in the context of entangled subspaces has gained a lot of interest [31][32][33]. All such results motivated us to search for constructing new and distinct CESs subspaces.…”
Section: Constructing Completely Entangled Subspaces Using Known Matr...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although, it was not mentioned directly, the transpose of these vectors are nothing but the rows of the well known Vandermonde matrix (see appendix B). Following this work the usage of Vandermonde matrices in the context of entangled subspaces has gained a lot of interest [31][32][33]. All such results motivated us to search for constructing new and distinct CESs subspaces.…”
Section: Constructing Completely Entangled Subspaces Using Known Matr...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A completely entangled subspace in one containing no product states [6], while a genuinely entangled subspace is one containing no states that are product across any bipartition (genuine entanglement is a stricter requirement than complete entanglement) [12,13]. Completely entangled subspaces are useful for locally discriminating pure quantum states [14,15], while genuinely entangled subspaces have been shown to have applications in quantum cryptography [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%