2012
DOI: 10.1521/aeap.2012.24.6.483
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ensuring It Works: A Community-Based Approach to HIV Prevention Intervention Development for Men Who Have Sex with Men in Chennai, India

Abstract: Men who have sex with men (MSM) in India have an HIV seroprevalence 22 times greater than the country’s general population and face unique challenges that may hinder the effectiveness of current HIV prevention efforts. To obtain an understanding of the logistical and sociocultural barriers MSM experience while accessing HIV prevention services, focus groups and key informant interviews were conducted with 55 MSM in Chennai, India. Qualitative data were analyzed using descriptive qualitative content analysis. S… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
36
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(51 reference statements)
3
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Keep it Up!, an interactive online program focused on healthy sexuality, relationships, and preventing HIV was recently found to be feasible and acceptable among diverse YMSM, and produced a significantly lower rate of condomless sex relative to controls (Mustanski et al, 2013a). As MSM report that HIV prevention messages are important but overlook other psychosocial and contextual issues related to HIV transmission among gay and bisexual men (Thomas et al, 2012), tailoring messages to youth’s unique risk factors may better resonate with that individual, reduce risk of fatigue, and increase likelihood of adherence to HIV prevention behaviors (Flowers et al, 2001). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Keep it Up!, an interactive online program focused on healthy sexuality, relationships, and preventing HIV was recently found to be feasible and acceptable among diverse YMSM, and produced a significantly lower rate of condomless sex relative to controls (Mustanski et al, 2013a). As MSM report that HIV prevention messages are important but overlook other psychosocial and contextual issues related to HIV transmission among gay and bisexual men (Thomas et al, 2012), tailoring messages to youth’s unique risk factors may better resonate with that individual, reduce risk of fatigue, and increase likelihood of adherence to HIV prevention behaviors (Flowers et al, 2001). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variability of sexual preferences and sexual arrangements across sub-groups of men who have sex with men suggests that it may not be appropriate to develop HIV prevention programming according to sexual identity (i.e., kothi, panthi , double-decker, and bisexual) (Thomas et al 2012). Anthropological research with Indian men who have sex with men has emphasised the fluidity and situational nature of gendered and sexual identities (Boyce 2007; Lorway et al 2009; Boyce and Khanna 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, we developed a model of self-acceptance as a key factor in promoting psychological resilience in MSM, as well as asked questions about their acceptability of format and content of the proposed intervention [14,18]. Additionally, prior to this pilot RCT, we conducted an open-pilot of the intervention in one group of MSM and made additional refinements to the intervention based on their exit interview feedback.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current study is part of a program of research to develop and initially test a culturally relevant, resilience-based HIV prevention intervention for MSM in India that addressed both sexual risk as well as a key resilience variable for this population, self-acceptance [14,18]. We hypothesize that the intervention would be feasible to deliver, and that MSM who were assigned to the intervention condition would reduce condomless sex in greater magnitude compared to MSM assigned to enhanced standard of care (ESOC) alone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%