I quantify the importance of financial structure, labor market rigidities and industry mix for cross-country asymmetries in monetary transmission. To do so, I determine how closely the impulse responses to a monetary policy shock obtained from country-specific vectorautoregressive (VAR) models and a non-standard panel VAR model match. In the country-specific VAR models, the impulse responses vary across countries in an unrestricted fashion. In the panel VAR model, the impulse responses also vary across countries, but only to the extent that countries differ regarding their financial structure, labor market rigidities and industry mix. For a sample of 20 industrialized countries over the time period from 1995 to 2009, I find that up to 70% (50%) of the cross-country asymmetries in the responses of output (prices) to a monetary policy shock can be accounted for by crosscountry differences in financial structure, labor market rigidities and industry mix. While in the short run asymmetries in the output responses arise mainly due to cross-country differences in industry mix, in the medium and long run differences in financial structure and labor market rigidities gain more importance. Moreover, cross-country differences in industry mix appear to be of rather minor importance for cross-country asymmetries in the transmission of monetary policy to prices.
Non-technical SummaryThe structures of many industrialized economies have changed markedly over the last decades. Globalization nd technological progress have fostered structural change, labor market deregulation and financial market development as well as integration. These changes may have important implications for the conduct of monetary policy, as labor market rigidities may dampen the sensitivity of inflation to monetary policy and enhance that of output; output and prices may be more sensitive to monetary policy changes the larger the share of an economy's output that is accounted for by durable goods manufacturing, that is, goods with high interest rate sensitivity of demand; the intensity of competitive pressures in an economy's banking system may affect the speed and extent of pass-through of changes in the policy rate to market rates faced by households and firms; the more important external financing in an economy, the stronger the amplification of the effects of The results suggest that policies in a currency union that aim at harmonizing labor market regulations, fostering structural change and financial integration as well as innovation have a large potential to reduce asymmetries in monetary transmission. Moreover, since the driving forces of structural change, labor market deregulation and financial market development observed in the last decades are likely to persist, these results suggest that the monetary transmission mechanism is likely to change in the future. Finally, the results of this paper suggest that financial structure, labor market rigidities and industry mix should be incorporated in theoretical business cycle models which are...