2017 IEEE 20th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/itsc.2017.8317647
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ensuring drivability of planned motions using formal methods

Abstract: Abstract-Motion planning of automated vehicles requires dynamical models to ensure that obtained trajectories are drivable. An often overlooked aspect is that motion planning is usually done using simplified models, which do not always sufficiently conform to the real behavior of vehicles. Thus, collision avoidance and drivability is not necessarily ensured. We address this problem by modeling vehicles as differential inclusions composed of simple dynamics and set-based uncertainty; conformance testing is used… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Online verification of general maneuvers would require a probabilistic representation of other traffic participants and scenarios, which is still computationally challenging because of the high complexity. The drivability of planned motions can also be checked for, and guaranteed, via reachability analysis (132). Instead of verifying car controllers online, an alternative is to build a library of local and verified road models, such as intersections and road segments, that are composed together to certify safety over networks (133).…”
Section: Verification and Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Online verification of general maneuvers would require a probabilistic representation of other traffic participants and scenarios, which is still computationally challenging because of the high complexity. The drivability of planned motions can also be checked for, and guaranteed, via reachability analysis (132). Instead of verifying car controllers online, an alternative is to build a library of local and verified road models, such as intersections and road segments, that are composed together to certify safety over networks (133).…”
Section: Verification and Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conformance method is based on [1], where a recorded output trace (of the SUT) is compared with the model for feedforward controller under certain disturbances. If traces errors are into specified bounds the model is trace conformed, but if values are out of bounds the model must be improved due was not able to accomplish the requirements.…”
Section: Trace Conformance Testing Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current work presents an automated vehicle verification approach based on trace conformance and its basis are in the work done by [1]. In this paper, the trace conformance is mainly to verify the abstract vehicle model used to control the system with robustness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We propose an implementation based on computing robust controllers or "primitives" that can restrict the vehicles to a waypoint graph structure even in the presence of stochastic disturbance. In particular, the vehicle dynamics are given bẏ We use a formal, set-based algorithm [13], [14], [15] to obtain controllers that steer cars from one node to another on the waypoint graph with each node being a set of states of the car's dynamics around a nominal state. The reason a set of states is used is because of the disturbance present.…”
Section: An Application In Traffic Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%