Ensuring Confidentiality in the Cloud of Things

Eugster, Patrick; Kumar, S. Krishna; Savvides, Savvas; Stephen, Julian James

doi:10.1109/mprv.2018.2877286

Cited by 7 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…While CoT can create many business opportunities, the privilege of accessing virtual resources and storage capacity in the cloud, as well as the protection of identity, security, and privacy, becomes very important. CoTs are built in public clouds, and IoT devices are often deployed in resource-limited areas, which further complicates the system [30,31]. The BCoT ecosystem can be seen as a blockchain as a service (BaaS) integrated with cloud computing to develop and deploy blockchains for cloud IoT applications.…”

Section: Related Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of a Smart Intercom Microservice System Based on the Cloud of Things

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research migrates a monolithic smart intercom system to a microservice architecture, making the system more secure, stable, and scalable. The security mechanisms of the instant messaging platform are combined with microservices to improve the security of the system. The stability and performance of microservices are shown to be better than those of monolithic services through experimental tests. Residents can use different instant messaging software instead of the handset to improve the convenience of using this system. This system also implements community broadcasts, platform broadcasts, unit broadcasts, and family broadcasts to exchange messages across different instant messaging platforms. This paper proposes OpenAPI for other smart intercoms to integrate this system’s services and resources. In addition, this study deploys two microservice architectures using a native load balancer with a kube proxy and a service mesh load balancer with an istio proxy. Experiments were conducted during which residents tested the kube proxy and the istio proxy using stress testing tools on two microservice architectures, and the results showed that the kube proxy was slightly better than the istio proxy.

show abstract

Section: Related Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%