2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ensemble machine learning-based algorithm for electric vehicle user behavior prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
51
2
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
51
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…MAPE is problematic when the actual value is close to 0 in the denominator and therefore creating a bias. On the contrary, SMAPE is the preferred metric for EV charging prediction because both the actual value and the predicted value is in the denominator [49].…”
Section: ) Evaluation Of Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…MAPE is problematic when the actual value is close to 0 in the denominator and therefore creating a bias. On the contrary, SMAPE is the preferred metric for EV charging prediction because both the actual value and the predicted value is in the denominator [49].…”
Section: ) Evaluation Of Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors in [49] utilized several ML models, including DT, K-NN and RF to predict session duration and energy consumption from two charging datasets. The first dataset contained charging sessions from University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) campus, thus representing nonresidential charging behavior.…”
Section: Supervised Learning For Analysis and Prediction Of Charmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, there have been some efforts to predict charging behaviour with machinelearning methods. The impact of accurate predictions on charging scheduling has been demonstrated in [36], where the authors suggest a potential 27% decrease in peak load. However, when using historical data of parking durations and energy consumption to predict user behaviour, there is a lack of understanding of individual users' preferences for service attributes, such as the location of the charger and the charging rates.…”
Section: Representation Of Charging Demandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From Table 3 it can be shown that the MAPE for the surface roughness is higher than that in the maximum forming angle model. This is because using the MAPE with the small output values (i.e., Ra values) has a problem since it takes only the observed values in the denominator (see Equation (7)) which leads to a reduction in the overall accuracy [31]. Later, in the evaluation section, suitable criteria will be used for both models to show the accuracy of the predictive models.…”
Section: Optimum Gbrt Parameters For Maximum Forming Angle and Surfacmentioning
confidence: 99%