2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.inffus.2004.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ensemble diversity measures and their application to thinning

Abstract: The diversity of an ensemble of classifiers can be calculated in a variety of ways. Here a diversity metric and a means for altering the diversity of an ensemble, called ''thinning'', are introduced. We evaluate thinning algorithms created by several techniques on 22 publicly available datasets. When compared to other methods, our percentage correct diversity measure shows a greatest correlation between the increase in voted ensemble accuracy and the diversity value. Also, the analysis of different ensemble cr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, several optimization-based pruning methods use the forward or backward search (FS/BS) strategy [18,19,20,21,22,23,24].…”
Section: Previous Work On Using Diversity For Ensemble Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In particular, several optimization-based pruning methods use the forward or backward search (FS/BS) strategy [18,19,20,21,22,23,24].…”
Section: Previous Work On Using Diversity For Ensemble Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• A given diversity measure (disregarding the performance of individual classifiers and of the ensemble) [19,20,23].…”
Section: Previous Work On Using Diversity For Ensemble Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Most of the measures evaluating the ensemble diversity before the validation are based on base classifiers disagreement on certain training samples, often called critical samples beyond the ensemble margin [45,46]. When there is only few examples, the diversity might not be observable within training sample.…”
Section: Learning Assumptions Of Ncfmentioning
confidence: 99%