2021
DOI: 10.5194/tc-15-169-2021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ensemble-based estimation of sea-ice volume variations in the Baffin Bay

Abstract: Abstract. Sea ice in the Baffin Bay plays an important role in deep water formation in the Labrador Sea and contributes to the variation of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) on larger scales. Sea-ice data from locally merged satellite observations (Sat-merged SIT) in the eastern Canadian Arctic and three state-of-the-art sea ice–ocean models are used to quantify sea-ice volume variations from 2011 to 2016. Ensemble-based sea-ice volume (SIV) fluxes and the related standard deviations in th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(91 reference statements)
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…S5). The higher sea ice thickness in the northeast of Baffin Bay in the LARM CryoSat-2 sea ice thickness from this study is not present in the Min et al (2021) sea ice thickness ensemble product.…”
Section: Intermission Differencescontrasting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…S5). The higher sea ice thickness in the northeast of Baffin Bay in the LARM CryoSat-2 sea ice thickness from this study is not present in the Min et al (2021) sea ice thickness ensemble product.…”
Section: Intermission Differencescontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…The spatial distribution of sea ice thickness is similar. Comparisons of CryoSat-2 mean sea ice thickness with a model-ensemble-based estimation in Baffin Bay (Min et al, 2021) show a similar spatial pattern and magnitude in sea ice thickness for most of Baffin Bay (Sect. S5).…”
Section: Intermission Differencesmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…For models that do not provide the h i variable, we multiply sea ice concentration with sea ice thickness to calculate it. Taking all these values into the above equation, we can estimate the SFWC as normalSnormalFnormalWnormalC=ASnormalrnormalenormalfSiSrefρiρwhinormalds0.79Ahinormalds $\mathrm{S}\mathrm{F}\mathrm{W}\mathrm{C}={\iint }_{A}\frac{{S}_{\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{f}}-{S}_{i}}{{S}_{\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{f}}}\frac{{\rho }_{i}}{{\rho }_{w}}{h}_{i}\mathrm{d}s\approx 0.79{\iint }_{A}{h}_{i}\mathrm{d}s$ which is consistent with other publications (e.g., C. Min et al., 2021; Spreen et al., 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure 5, there was a positive anomaly in most regions of the Baffin Bay (BB) for both OW and PC6 vessels in all years. The areas close to the Baffin Island were not perennially accessible because the thick ice (>1.2 m) was located east of Baffin Island in March [40]. The navigable days in the CAA were almost with negative anomaly for both vessels because thick ice obstructed the narrow strait, especially in the northwest of the CAA.…”
Section: Regional Navigabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%