2008
DOI: 10.1021/es801456q
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enrichment of Uranium in Particulate Matter during Litter Decomposition Affected byGammarus pulexL.

Abstract: Plant litter and organic matter of aquatic sediments provide a significant sink of soluble inorganic uranium species in contaminated ecosystems. The uranium content in detritus has been observed to increase significantly during decomposition. However, the influence of the decomposer community on uranium fixation remains unclear. In view of this, we investigated the influence of a shredder (the freshwater shrimp Gammarus pulex L) on uranium fixation and mobilization during the degradation of plant litter. Leaf … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the data contrast with findings from experiments revealing an impact of invertebrate shredders on metal fixation/remobilization with no influence of the DOC level (Schaller et al, 2010a;Schaller and Machill, 2012). This contrast may be explained by a lower fixation capacity of the smaller sizes of POM in the current study, because these smaller sizes of POM contain only feces of the snails and less fragmented leaf litter, compared to studies using invertebrate shredders which contains smaller parts of leaf litter (Schaller et al, 2008(Schaller et al, , 2010a, which in turn may result in lower amounts of heterotrophic biofilm growing on the smaller sized POM. However, the overall mobilization of metals/metalloids by invertebrate grazers has nothing to do with redox mediated processes as nonredox sensitive elements (Mg and Sr) show a comparable remobilization pattern to elements with increasing mobility under reduced (Mn, Co and As) as well as oxic conditions (U) (Borch et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…However, the data contrast with findings from experiments revealing an impact of invertebrate shredders on metal fixation/remobilization with no influence of the DOC level (Schaller et al, 2010a;Schaller and Machill, 2012). This contrast may be explained by a lower fixation capacity of the smaller sizes of POM in the current study, because these smaller sizes of POM contain only feces of the snails and less fragmented leaf litter, compared to studies using invertebrate shredders which contains smaller parts of leaf litter (Schaller et al, 2008(Schaller et al, , 2010a, which in turn may result in lower amounts of heterotrophic biofilm growing on the smaller sized POM. However, the overall mobilization of metals/metalloids by invertebrate grazers has nothing to do with redox mediated processes as nonredox sensitive elements (Mg and Sr) show a comparable remobilization pattern to elements with increasing mobility under reduced (Mn, Co and As) as well as oxic conditions (U) (Borch et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Uranium, in comparison to most cationic metals, has a relatively complex solid-aqueous chemistry, which depends on a number of factors that influence the partitioning of U between the aqueous and solid phases (Ames et al, 1983;Catalano and Brown Jr, 2005;CCME, 2011;Langmuir, 1978;Markich, 2002;US EPA, 1999). Many ligands, such as phosphate, carbonate, and humic and fulvic substances can form complexes that are readily soluble and mobile in aquatic systems (Cheng et al, 2006;Franke et al, 2000;Schaller et al, 2008). However, transport of U can be limited by strong adsorption onto solid phases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schaller et al . () reported enhanced fixation of uranium in faecal particles generated by a shredder, Gammarus pulex , feeding on uranium‐contaminated leaves. Similar patterns were observed for a broad range of other metals, including iron, zinc, lead and copper (Schaller, Mkandawire & Dudel, ), and also for some organic contaminants such as DDT‐metabolites (Drake, Eganhouse & McArthur, ; Lotufo & Landrum, ).…”
Section: Anthropogenic Impacts and Ecotoxicological Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%