2011
DOI: 10.3788/cjl201138.1115002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enrichment of Trace Lead in Water with Graphite and Measurement by Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, laser ablation in solutions is always affected by the surrounding pressure, and laser-generated plasma usually encounters rapid annihilation, 23 resulting in a shortened plasma lifetime and accordingly weakened breakdown of spectral line signals. Various methods including phase transformation 24 27 and metal substrate assistance 8 , 28 , 29 have been proposed to improve the detection sensitivity of LIBS in solutions. The drawbacks that restrict directly analyzing liquids could also be partially subdued by dual-pulse LIBS (DP-LIBS) techniques 30 , 31 or creating fluid jets 32 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, laser ablation in solutions is always affected by the surrounding pressure, and laser-generated plasma usually encounters rapid annihilation, 23 resulting in a shortened plasma lifetime and accordingly weakened breakdown of spectral line signals. Various methods including phase transformation 24 27 and metal substrate assistance 8 , 28 , 29 have been proposed to improve the detection sensitivity of LIBS in solutions. The drawbacks that restrict directly analyzing liquids could also be partially subdued by dual-pulse LIBS (DP-LIBS) techniques 30 , 31 or creating fluid jets 32 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vander et al [10] first used graphite as the base and the result showed that the LIBS signal was stable. Then Wang et al [11] and Shi et al [12] measured Pb and Ni enriched on a graphite flake in water and the limits of detection (LOD) were, respectively, 0.0665 mg/L and 0.280 mg/L. However, the manual titration and oven heating which were used for graphite sample preparation in the above studies could not meet the needs of automatic and in situ detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%