Enriching the knowledgebase using unification techniques

Chaudhary, Deepa; Yadav, Pratibha; Singh, Rakesh K.; Mishra, Swapnil; Siddharth,

doi:10.1049/cp.2012.2548

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The ontology describes concepts, relationships, formal logic axioms and objects of a particular domain [17]. It allows for a shared and common understanding of the structure of information among people or software agents.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Ontology of Preference-Based Multiobjective Metaheuristics

Li,

Yevseyeva,

Basto-Fernandes

et al. 2016

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

User preference integration is of great importance in multi-objective optimization, in particular in many objective optimization. Preferences have long been considered in traditional multicriteria decision making (MCDM) which is based on mathematical programming. Recently, it is integrated in multi-objective metaheuristics (MOMH), resulting in focus on preferred parts of the Pareto front instead of the whole Pareto front. The number of publications on preference-based multiobjective metaheuristics has increased rapidly over the past decades. There already exist various preference handling methods and MOMH methods, which have been combined in diverse ways. This article proposes to use the Web Ontology Language (OWL) to model and systematize the results developed in this field. A review of the existing work is provided, based on which an ontology is built and instantiated with state-of-the-art results. The OWL ontology is made public and open to future extension. Moreover, the usage of the ontology is exemplified for different usecases, including querying for methods that match an engineering application, bibliometric analysis, checking existence of combinations of preference models and MOMH techniques, and discovering opportunities for new research and open research questions.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%