Proceedings of the International Symposium on Pervasive Displays 2014
DOI: 10.1145/2611009.2617196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enriching Public displays Ads Recommendations using an Individual

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first interactions were useful to test the collaborative filtering and the aggregation techniques for the advertising domain. The results were published in [51,52]. At the end, we completed a dataset with 127 ads, 176 users, and 10.128 ratings for the tests.…”
Section: Dataset Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first interactions were useful to test the collaborative filtering and the aggregation techniques for the advertising domain. The results were published in [51,52]. At the end, we completed a dataset with 127 ads, 176 users, and 10.128 ratings for the tests.…”
Section: Dataset Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of them repeated the experiment because of their relationships with other members of the group. Regarding the group recommendations displayed on the Smart TV, we alternated two aggregation techniques between the groups to test the effect of each one; previous experiments showed a better performance for the chosen techniques [51]. We used the Least Misery aggregation technique for the odd groups (1, 3, 5, and 7); this technique makes a list of ratings with the minimum individual ratings, and the items are recommended based on the rating on that list.…”
Section: Online Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%