2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-34129-3_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enriching Product Ads with Metadata from HTML Annotations

Abstract: Abstract. Product ads are a popular form of search advertizing offered by major search engines, including Yahoo, Google and Bing. Unlike traditional search ads, product ads include structured product specifications, which allow search engine providers to perform better keyword-based ad retrieval. However, the level of completeness of the product specifications varies and strongly influences the performance of ad retrieval. On the other hand, online shops are increasing adopting semantic markup languages such a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dataset was introduced in [23]. Since the content of the product name property is a short text listing various product features rather than the actual name of the product, we extract the product properties shown in Table 1 from the product name values using the dictionary-based method presented in [41]. We choose the Abt-Buy dataset because it is widely used to evaluate different matching systems [5,9].…”
Section: Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The dataset was introduced in [23]. Since the content of the product name property is a short text listing various product features rather than the actual name of the product, we extract the product properties shown in Table 1 from the product name values using the dictionary-based method presented in [41]. We choose the Abt-Buy dataset because it is widely used to evaluate different matching systems [5,9].…”
Section: Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, in [24] the authors extend the FEBRL approach from [23] with more detailed features. Finally, in [41], the authors compare various classifiers for product resolution (SVMs, Random Forest, Naive Bayes) with features extracted from a dictionary method and multiple Conditional Random Fields (CRFs) models. The authors, extended their work in [42], where they present extraction models with latent continuous features for product matching and classification, proving that more sophisticated feature extraction methods significantly improve traditional machine learning methods for entity resolution.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, several features are extracted from the title and the description of the products using manually written regular expressions. In contrast, named entity recognition based feature extraction models are developed in [18] and [26]. Both approaches use a CRF model for feature extraction, however [18] has a limited ability to extract explicit attribute-value pairs, which is improved upon in [26].…”
Section: Product Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once all attribute-value pairs are extracted from the given dataset of offers, we continue with normalizing the values of the attributes. To do so, we use the same attribute normalzation pipeline presented in [26], i.e., attribute type detection, string normalization, number and number with unit of measurement normalization.…”
Section: Attribute Value Normalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation