2023
DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocad055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ENRICHing medical imaging training sets enables more efficient machine learning

Abstract: Objective Deep learning (DL) has been applied in proofs of concept across biomedical imaging, including across modalities and medical specialties. Labeled data are critical to training and testing DL models, but human expert labelers are limited. In addition, DL traditionally requires copious training data, which is computationally expensive to process and iterate over. Consequently, it is useful to prioritize using those images that are most likely to improve a model’s performance, a practic… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study has several strengths. First is the diversity of the imaging cohort 22 . This cohort was external to the dataset on which the model was trained, differed with respect to image formats and scanning protocol (Figure 1) and included imaging studies from several clinics and sonographers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study has several strengths. First is the diversity of the imaging cohort 22 . This cohort was external to the dataset on which the model was trained, differed with respect to image formats and scanning protocol (Figure 1) and included imaging studies from several clinics and sonographers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include, in particular, the analysis of large and complex datasets and the discovery of relationships in these datasets. Most recent studies on the application of AI on medical image data have relied on training neural networks on thousands to hundreds of thousands of training samples [40][41][42][43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%