2016
DOI: 10.1103/physrevphyseducres.12.020114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enriching gender in physics education research: A binary past and a complex future

Abstract: In this article, we draw on previous reports from physics, science education, and women's studies to propose a more nuanced treatment of gender in physics education research (PER). A growing body of PER examines gender differences in participation, performance, and attitudes toward physics. We have three critiques of this work: (1) it does not question whether the achievements of men are the most appropriate standard, (2) individual experiences and student identities are undervalued, and (3) the binary model o… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
99
0
7

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
3
99
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…For a more recent summary of research into possible explanations of male and female performance differences in physics see Henderson et al [40]. For a more general discussion of gender in physics see Traxler et al [8]. For an overview of gender disparities in STEM see Eddy and Brownell [41].…”
Section: A Gender Gap Investigations Of the Fcimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For a more recent summary of research into possible explanations of male and female performance differences in physics see Henderson et al [40]. For a more general discussion of gender in physics see Traxler et al [8]. For an overview of gender disparities in STEM see Eddy and Brownell [41].…”
Section: A Gender Gap Investigations Of the Fcimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coding all students (typically from institutional records) as male or female simplifies the complexity of gender identity, ignores the nuances of individual experiences, and (in the case of DIF) uses male students as the measure of "normal" against which female students are compared [8]. We chose to replicate these assumptions for the purpose of engaging with the long tradition of gender gap studies that follow this model.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations