1989
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.1989.tb00777.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enrich Marital Inventory: A Discriminant Validity and Cross‐validation Assessment

Abstract: To assess the validity and clinical utility of the marital inventory ENRICH, a discriminant validity study was conducted using a national sample of 5039 married couples. The sample was randomly split in order to form a cross-validation group. ENRICH is a multidimensional scale and two types of analysis were conducted to assess the value of these various scales. Results from discriminant analysis indicated that using either the individual scores or couples' scores, happily married couples could be discriminated… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
136
0
18

Year Published

1991
1991
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 226 publications
(167 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(16 reference statements)
4
136
0
18
Order By: Relevance
“…The discriminant and concurrent validity of these scales have been established (12). The Swedish version of the inventory has been evaluated (13), whereby the reliability and the validity of the instrument have been established to be satisfactory.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discriminant and concurrent validity of these scales have been established (12). The Swedish version of the inventory has been evaluated (13), whereby the reliability and the validity of the instrument have been established to be satisfactory.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The validity of the ENRICH marital satisfaction scale was calculated as 0.86 through the examination of its content validity and its reliability was confirmed with a Cronbach's alpha value of 0.78 (Asoodeh et al, 2010;Fowers et al, 1989). The validity of the Snyder hope scale has also been reported as favorable and over 0.7 through the examination of its content validity (Grewal & Porter, 2007).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In the present study, the 'equality aspect of men and women' was left out and the other nine items were studied. In all these 9 items, there was a significant difference between the level of religiosity and marital satisfaction [30] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%