2022
DOI: 10.1016/s2352-3026(22)00175-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enoxaparin for primary thromboprophylaxis in symptomatic outpatients with COVID-19 (OVID): a randomised, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre, phase 3 trial

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
36
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(22 reference statements)
5
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Enoxaparin for Primary Thromboprophylaxis in Ambulatory Patients With COVID-19 (OVID) trial included patients older than 50 years presenting with acute COVID-19 symptoms. 70 There was no significant reduction in the PE rate between standard-intensity prophylactic anticoagulation with enoxaparin for 14 days and standard of care (RR: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.03–2.26). No bleeding events were reported.…”
Section: Preventionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The Enoxaparin for Primary Thromboprophylaxis in Ambulatory Patients With COVID-19 (OVID) trial included patients older than 50 years presenting with acute COVID-19 symptoms. 70 There was no significant reduction in the PE rate between standard-intensity prophylactic anticoagulation with enoxaparin for 14 days and standard of care (RR: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.03–2.26). No bleeding events were reported.…”
Section: Preventionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…There is no discussion, instead, that routine primary thromboprophylaxis in symptomatic COVID-19 outpatients would not be clinically effective, and should hence be currently discouraged. 34 35…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no discussion, instead, that routine primary thromboprophylaxis in symptomatic COVID-19 outpatients would not be clinically effective, and should hence be currently discouraged. 34,35 To close off this discussion, we should also point out the possibility for confusion in regards to the characterization of COVID-19 severity. In particular, the term "COVID-19-associated acute illness," which may alternatively be called "hospitalized non-critically ill," or as used in one Commentary in this issue as "COVID-19-associated moderate illness," 11 has the potential to be confused with "COVID-19associated severe illness" or "COVID-19-associated critical illness."…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first, Stefano Barco and colleagues for the OVID investigators present data comparing enoxaparin 40 mg daily for 14 days with open control among 472 symptomatic outpatients with COVID-19 in Switzerland and Germany. 6 In a manner almost identical to ACTIV-4B, the OVID DSMB elected to terminate the trial early on the basis of lower than anticipated event rates and a low probability of showing efficacy associated with active intervention; overall, the trial primary endpoint of any hospitalisation or death occurred in eight individuals in the group allocated to enoxaparin and eight in those allocated to open control (hazard ratio [HR] 0·98 95% CI 0·37–2·56; p=0·96). All hospitalisations were due to respiratory insufficiency or COVID-19 pneumonia with no deaths recorded.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%